Part Number: DP83848H Other Parts Discussed in Thread: DP83822I We want to use the DP83848H (or other TI 100BaseTX transceiver chips) in a non-Ethernet application as a data transceiver for longer than 100m (over Cat5 cable) distances.
We want to use…
Part Number: DP83848H We have two DP83848H with separate I/O except they share a common MDC/MDIO. Unfortunately, neither have pulling/strapping resistors on the PHYAD pins, thus at power-on they have the same address.
The datasheet states the address…
Part Number: DP83848H Team,
The DP83822 datasheet states that this part is a current mode line driver.
Are DP83848 and DP83867 also current mode drivers or voltage mode?
Thanks
Hi Josh,
I am assuming MDIO access is working properly from the microcontroller.
Can you verify that RX_DV has a 2.2k pull-up resistor to put the DP83848H in RMII mode?
Would you also please verify that your PHY ID is correct on MDIO transactions…
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: DP83848H I couldn't find a topic already covering this so I start a new post.
I looked trough the data sheet of the DP83848H ( Literature Number: SNLS229C ) but could not find any details on whether this PHY chip has…
Part Number: DP83848VYB Other Parts Discussed in Thread: DP83848H Hi Team,
Question regarding the DP83848 part.
I purchased a DP83848IVV/NOPB part in 48 pin LQFP.
My Linux kernel reads the PHY vendor ID as 0x2000 5C90 which does not match the SNLS266E…
Part Number: DP83848Q-Q1 Hi Team,
There is a good new that we DIN DP83848Q-Q1!
But cause it is out of stock !
Does DP83848LFQ or DP83848H is a good solution to replace?
If yes, is there anything to pay attention to in the design? THX
Part Number: DP83848M Other Parts Discussed in Thread: DP83848H Hello,
we are designing an EtherCAT board with two Phys from the DP83848H/J/K/M/T family, preferably the DP83848M.
The idea is to connect a crystal to the first DP83484M for clocking…
