Part Number: DRV8316C Hi Team,
Using the motor drive chip DRV8316CTRGFR, when the chip is not connected to a motor, OUTA/B/C switch according to the input signals INHA/B/C. However, once a motor is connected, OUT is no longer under control, and the…
Part Number: DRV8316C-Q1
Hi!
I have a question regarding the HW variant of the motor driver DRV8316C-Q1. Is power sequencing, i.e. feeding the buck converter output voltage to the LDO, available? I see that it's available in the SPI variant, but I…
Part Number: DRV8316C Hi,
We consider to use the DRV8316C and we don't need to use the BUCK REGULATOR function, and we can set the BUCK_DIS to solve this issue, please advise the hardware circuit for the PIN SW_BK, GND_BK, FB_BK, can we connect these…
Part Number: DRV8316C-Q1 Hi!
I am considering the DRV8316C-Q1 for driving a BDC motor, mainly because the chips ability to measure bidirectional current. There are two open questions:
I would like to operate the motor in bipolar (locked anti-phase…
Part Number: DRV8316C Hi Team,
Using 8316CT, The schematic diagram is as follows, and it was found during testing that BUCK has no voltage output What is the reason?
Part Number: DRV8316C Dear TI Team,
Please provide the lifecycle status and long-term availability outlook for DRV8316CTRGFR, DRV8876PWPR, and DRV8876RGTR. We are evaluating these devices for a product that must be supported through 2033 and preferably…
Part Number: DRV8316C Other Parts Discussed in Thread: MSPM0G3507 Tool/software: Hi, I have already published the new article:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/390794308_A_new_method_at_the_180-control_5-SVPWM_of_BLDC_-addendum
I will kindly…
Part Number: DRV8316C Other Parts Discussed in Thread: DRV8316 , DRV8376 Tool/software: Hi,
1. Can DRV8316C work with 100 percent PWM (does have a Tricle)
2. Will a similar driver come in the future for supply 65V (for bigger currents than DRV8376…
Part Number: DRV8316C Hi,
We consider to use the DRV8316C for our BDC driver(H-bridge) and please advise if DRV8316C is available or not?
If yes, how to implement this solution? thanks.
