• LM2937: Junction Temperature

  

  Simon Jagla

  TI Thinks Resolved

  Part Number: LM2937 Hi Colleagues, you help us (customer and me) understand why we are specifying different junction temperatures for different packages? in another post it was said that these devices have the same die in all packages: https://e2e.ti…

  • over 2 years ago
  • Power management
  • Power management forum

• LM2937: The maximum allowable power dissipation

  

  Shotaro Sakai

  TI Thinks Resolved

  Part Number: LM2937 Hello team, I want to ask about a question related with the below. Can we use same formula in case of LM2937IMP? LM2937IMP has lower maximum value(=85C). I understood the all devices use same die. https://e2e.ti.com/support/power-management…

  • over 2 years ago
  • Power management
  • Power management forum

• LM2937: 3.3V

  

  Ray Vincent Aranzaso

  Part Number: LM2937 Hi, Good Day. I have a customer who is working with LM2937ET-3.3/NOPB. Please see below his query for your reference. Thank you very much. I'm looking at the datasheet for the LM2937ET-3.3 (LM2937ET-3.3/NOPB) and I've noticed section…

  • over 2 years ago
  • Power management
  • Power management forum

• LM2937: LM2937IMP-3.3/NOPB & LM2937IMP-5.0/NOPB

  

  Links

  TI Thinks Resolved

  Part Number: LM2937 Hi Team Please confirm us what are the differences between P/N: LM2937IMP-3.3/NOPB & LM2937IMP-5.0/NOPB. Because in the datasheet, I find that the output voltage is 5, 8, 10, 12, 15, not 3.3V ,so I am puzzled。 https://www.ti.com…

  • over 3 years ago
  • Power management
  • Power management forum

• LM2937: IMP to IMP/NOPB

  

  user6498224

  Part Number: LM2937 Hello, We are having problems with the LM2937IMP-3.3. Have used the part in our design for the last 6-7 years without issue. Now however. it appears on new systems, the LM2937IMP-3.3 is overheating after running for a short period, the…

  • over 3 years ago
  • Power management
  • Power management forum
Answered

• LM2937: Recommended ADJ equivalent device

  

  Clint Jensen

  Resolved

  Part Number: LM2937 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: LM2941 Hello, I would like to replace a 12V version of the LM2937 with an equivalent LDO with an adjustable output since it is undecided whether we will need 15V or 18V output in the final design. It…

  • Resolved

  • over 4 years ago
  • Power management
  • Power management forum
Answered

• LM2937: LM2937-5 minimum load current requirement

  

  James Dupre51

  Resolved

  Part Number: LM2937 Hi, Does the LM2937-5 have a minimum load requirement? For that matter, do any of the devices in the LM2937 family have a minimum load current requirement? Regards, James

  • Resolved

  • over 6 years ago
  • Power management
  • Power management forum
Answered

• TPS7B69-Q1: load transient and line transient compare with LM2937-5.0

  

  James Su5

  Resolved

  Part Number: TPS7B69-Q1 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TPS7B69 , LM2937 , Please help to support load transient and line transient compare wave form at TPS7B6950-Q1 and LM2937-5.0,I can’t easy get it from each spec. Test condition : Vin 16 to 36V…

  • Resolved

  • over 5 years ago
  • Power management
  • Power management forum

• LM2937-3.3: Output capacitor polarity reversed?

  

  Lin

  TI Thinks Resolved

  Part Number: LM2937-3.3 Hi, In Figure 22 of the datasheet, is the Cout polarity reversed? Or is that intentional?

  • over 5 years ago
  • Power management
  • Power management forum

• LM2937: Aluminum and Ceramic Capacitor in parallel for Output

  

  Joseph Kielasa

  TI Thinks Resolved

  Part Number: LM2937 The datasheet recommends that a Tantalum capacitor be used in parallel with an Aluminum cap for the output. Can you use a ceramic capacitor instead?

  • over 5 years ago
  • Power management
  • Power management forum

Didn't find what you are looking for? Post a new question.