Part Number: LM3S5749
Please Provide Complete Material Declaration for the part LM3S5749-IQC50-A0 , as per the PCN-20210219000.1.
Thanks and Regards
THomas George
Part Number: LM3S5749 As per 20210219000.1, TI has made material change to LM3S5749-IQC50-A0. Please provide updated material document which reflects changes mentioned in PCN.
Part Number: LM3S5749 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: SEGGER We have PCBs using LM3S5B91 that need firmware fixes. Since this part
is obsolete, please note the part number on the title is different.
The manual configuration setting in the JTAG LM flash…
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: LM3S5749 I'm having problems getting USB to initialize with the LM3S5749 Processor. Is anyone using this combination and are you having any similiar USB problems?? Any help would be appreciated. Thanks.
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: LM3S5749 I am developing an app using the LM3S5749 processor in Code Red. The code calls I'm using for USB are the same as the Examples code for usb_dev_bulk for the LM3S9B92 development board. I also have CAN running on…
And what about MSP-GANG like flasher, without installation, with no dll, and open source PC side (CLI) / interface.
To boost SBW speed over the speed of full JTAG interface, SBW interface is extended with one extra line, but with FRAM devices it can also…
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: LM3S5749 OK. So it's clear that TI is (or has) dropped the LM3S family of processors. I am at the decision point in a project and need some input.
What is the level of commitment fromTI for the LM4F series?
The current…
Just so that I am clear, I do realize that you desired, targeted device is the LM3S5749.
However, withing CCS, is your target_config.ccxml (or equivalent Target Configuration included in the project) pointing to the LM3S5749?
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: LM3S5749 My problem is that I started with the DK-LM3S9B6 and installed that version of CCS. However, after the intial playing with that board,I tried to go on to develop for the LM3S5749. Of course that license wouldn't…