Hi Peter-san, Thank you always for your kind support. I understood. >Why does the customer not want to use the LM5102 ? According to web price, LM5105 is a little lower than LM5102 so I would like to decide which device I should suggest. Best Regards…
Hi Howard,
The LM5041 does not have any deadtime between the two outputs as one output is a simple inversion of the other.
The LM5102 is a 100V gate driver with 1.6A/1.8A gate drive capability and adjustable dead-time. Do we know why the customer…
Part Number: LM5107 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: UCC27282 ,
Hi team,
Our customer is looking for an alternative part for LM5107MA/NOPB gate driver where either the HO and LO remain low when HI and LI are high.
From the product folder, the recommended…
Dear Johny, LM5101 or LM5102 is recommend to co-work with LM5041 for buck gate driver which can program delay time. You can refer to LM5041EVAL reference design. Thanks
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: LM5102 , LM5105 Hi
my customer wants to reach 50ns dead time on LM5105 / LM5102.
our D/S says that deadtime can be adjusted from 100ns to 600ns which seems to tell that 50ns is not achievable
BUT
it also says…
Hello Go,
I am an applications engineer at TI and will look to answer your questions. As was mentioned with previous responses, the UCC27210 does not have the feature we call input interlock which prevents both outputs from being high.
TI does have…
Hi Howard,
thanks for reaching out! Im on gate drivers apps team and will help out.
Driver peak current does not determine gate driver power dissipation. (2.8A is the instantaneous peak current for only 100ns.)
Gate drive power dissipation calculation…
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: BQ51013 , LM5102 , BQ500210 Hi
I'm looking for TI Wireless Power(charger) Solution..
Could you pls recommend which is the best solution?
How about BQ500210R?, BQ51013? and LM5102?
Demand Spec as below :
Primary…
