Part Number: LM318-N Other Parts Discussed in Thread: LM318 , TL071H , LM741 Tool/software: Hi,
I am trying to build the non-inverting amplifier circuit using LM318-N. I attached the circuit schematics below. The input is using pulse generator with…
Part Number: LM741QML Other Parts Discussed in Thread: LM741 The TI Application Report "Understanding Operational Amplifier Specifications" states in section "5.2 Input Offset Voltage" that "Normal aging in semiconductors causes changes in the characteristics…
Part Number: TL081 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: LM741 , TLV9301 Additional question.
I am also considering adopting LM741CN. Please let me know the following information as it is not mentioned in the data sheet. (1) When LM741 is used at -20°C to…
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: LM741 , UA741 Hi,
I am component engineer working with Honeywell Aerospace.
We are looking for FFF alternate suggestion for discontinued Harris Semiconductor MPN CA3010.
Kindly review and confirm if you have any…
Hi Yasuhiko-san,
UA741CDR is the legacy part, which the ESD rating should be similar to LM741 , which was designed before ESD standards like HBM, CDM and MM. It does not have more robust ESD handling.
If you have other questions, please let me know…
Hey Mike,
LM741QML is tested to conform to MIL-STD-883, while LM741-MIL is a similar device that conforms to a legacy mil std, with fewer tested parameters.
All the tested parameters are detailed here in the datasheet:
LM741QML: https://www.ti.com…
Part Number: TMUX8212 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TMUX7411F , TMUX7412F , TMUX7413F , TMUX7462F , TMUX7436F , OPA2992 , LM741 , TVS1800 , TVS1801 Tool/software: I'm using a TMUX8212 in a design that requires the board's outputs be clamped to ~20V…
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: LM741 , TLV3701 , TLV7011 I am using an 8 pin DIP package presently but if this takes off I would go to SMT. But for now just a plain ol' 8 pin DIP
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: LM741 , LM338 , OPA990 Hi Team,
A customer would like to use LM107 in the circuit of Figure 44 in the link below. Since the LM107 has been obsoleted, can he use LM741 or LM101A? If not, can you please suggest an alternative…