Part Number: OPA2333 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TLV9001 , LM321LV , LMV321A , TLV8801 , OPA333 , Hello,
I need a voltage to current circuit to power a tiny LED from a DAC. DAC output is 0 - 2500mV. The LED has a Vf of 2.85V. Supply voltage (V+ in SLAU502…
Part Number: LMV321A Hi sirs,
Is LMV321AIDCKR p-p compatible with LMV321IDCKR?
What's the difference and advantage for A-version?
Thanks a lot!
Best Regards,
Sean Liao
Part Number: LMV321A Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TLV9064 , TLV9002 , TLV9061 , TLV6741 , LMV321 Dear Sir:
May I to know the release date of LMV321A? Thanks
Best Regard
Jason
The absolute maximum ratings forbid voltages above 5.7 V.
The LMV321A and LM321LV have clamping diodes to V+, so larger voltages are allowed as long as the current is limited. This current flows into the V+ supply and might (partially) power up any devices…
Part Number: XTR117 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: LM2902 , TLV9001 , LMV321A , , OPA392 , OPA391 , OPA336 , OPA396 Hi Team,
I am using XTR117AIDGKR as a current transmitter(4-20mA) for a position transmitter.
So kindly verify and let me know your comments …
Hi Jheng-wei,
I would do it this way:
jheng_lmv321a.TSC
As there is no proper model for the LMV321 available, I have chosen the LMV321A for the simulation.
As you can see from the simulation, the circuit would not be stable with this huge load capacitance…
Hello,
Thank you for your supports.
I could evaluate the sample of LMV321A.
The output of LMV321A is staying low, during power up.
It is fit for our systems.
However, our another circuit will require 12V.
Do you have any other OP Amp IC with the same…
Part Number: TS321 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: LM358B , LM358-N , TLV9001 , LMV321A , Hi Support team
1. My customer would like to know the min input offset voltage spec in TA = 25 deg C
is this possible to provide that?
2. Does Input offset voltage…
Hi Wesley,
No problem! First, I would highly recommend using LMV321A for your application. LMV321A is the improved version of LMV321.
Next, the circuit above will work fine. But, you can reduce the number of components used if you go with the below circuit…