Part Number: LMZ10504 Tool/software: Thank you for your continued support.
Thank you for teaching me how to use a low inductance probe.
I have a question.
Once again, a failure occurred with the replaced U117 part (LMZ10504TZX-ADJ/NOPB). I confirmed…
Part Number: LMZ10504 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TPSM82816 Tool/software: Thank you for your continued support.
I have an additional question. Cause_of_LMZ10504_failure_20241223.pdf
The LMZ10504TZX-ADJ/NOPB no longer outputs an output voltage…
Part Number: LMZ10504 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TPSM82816 , TPSM82813 , TPS62140 , TPS746 Tool/software: Thank you for your continued support.
The attached circuit is one that starts up the output of U98/U116/U117 with a delay after power-on…
Part Number: LMZ10504 Tool/software: Hello,
Regarding the component LMz10504TZX-ADJ/NOPB I need to know if the data code is printed on the component.
If yes i need to code how to read it.
Thank you
Part Number: LMZ10504 A board with MCU and FPGA, this voltage regulator provide the main 3.3V board supply from an input 5V supply. Now I have to use the same board in an application in which the input supply is 3.3V, I would keep all the PCB design,…
Hi Eric,
It seems like the compensation table was changed because the values were not always stable over the entire operation range and with part to part variations. To better provide a stable and recommended circuit the system engineer redid the table…
Part Number: LMZ10504 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: LMZ31704 , LM10504 , TPS25925 , TPD1E05U06 when i use the LMZ10504，this module often damaged,the ouput pin has shorted to ground,
the input voltage is 4.5 and the output is 3V3.
please see the…
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: LMZ10504LMZ10504 data sheet recommends a ceramic input cap, 22 uF or 47 uF. The applicaiton requires the use of Mil-spec capacitors and this much capacitance in ceramic is very large.
Is a Tantalum capacitor acceptable…
There is an additional parenthesis and a square term missing in the Rfbt equation #6. Please use the following equation while we are updating the application note:
Rfbt = Rcint * (1+fco/fLC)*Vin*sqrt(1+(fco/fesr)^2)/((sqrt((1+(fco/fLC)^2)^2+(fco/(Q*fLC…
Hello Eric,
I see similar kind of switch node coupling on the evaluation board as well.
I suspect this may be due to capacitive coupling from the SW node to the EN line inside the module package - perhaps due to the close proximity of all components…
