Part Number: MULTIPKGLDOEVM-823 Hi
Could you give me the design file for this board? It means board data and Gerber data.
www.ti.com/.../MULTIPKGLDOEVM-823
Thanks
Suzuki
Part Number: TPS723 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: MULTIPKGLDOEVM-823 , The TI website recommends the MULTIPKGLDOEVM-823 for this regulator. The regulator package is SOT23, DBV. However, the input pin on the board layout is pin 1 and the ground pin is…
Part Number: MULTIPKGLDOEVM-823 Hi team,
Could you offer the design files of the "MULTIPKGLDOEVM-823" EVM, I would like do some boards based on the design files.
http://www.ti.com/tool/MULTIPKGLDOEVM-823?keyMatch=MULTIPKGLDO&tisearch=Search…
Hey Zena,
Customer certainly can move to TPS7B81-Q1 device to use 2x2mm DRV package.
There are performance difference between TPS7B81-Q1 and TPS7B87-Q1. I have listed them here:
2. No other specific requirement are needed. Customer only need to design…
Hi Chris,
We looked through our database and we cannot find documentation which shows our CE declaration of conformity. We believe that it has passed due to our attention to detail and strict compliance reviews within our EVMs, but this is not something…
Hi,
We don't have this information on hand. Unfortunately we do not have the bandwidth to measure the output impedance to provide an equivalent inductance, so what I recommend is to order samples for this device and order a MULTIPKGLDOEVM-823 to measure…
Part Number: TPS723 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: MULTIPKGLDOEVM-823 Please give us some advice regarding TPS72301DBVR. I'm trying to check the characteristics of TPS72301DBV with MultiPkgLDOEVM-823. Check the catalog of TPS72301DBV and you will…
Hi Andrey,
Sure thing. In case you're interested, we do have an EVM that has a DBV footprint on it that you could use to test this part, see the link below.
https://www.ti.com/tool/MULTIPKGLDOEVM-823
I'll close this case.
Best regards,
Ni…
Hello Gary,
Yes, I agree that the 100KHz entry in the table does not match with the curve. It is quite likely a typo. I do not see too much wrong in the PSRR plot you have generated. It is not atypical to see ~3-4B of variation in PSRR from device…
