Part Number: MUX36S08 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: OPA2196
Customer wants to use MUX36S08 to change the gain of amplifier, please take your time to review the schematic and give some suggestions to possible issues . This is a great chance…
Part Number: MUX36S08 Dear colleague,
Now we are promoting TI precision lab MUX video to customers.
But in Con as below:
What does K mean? In video, it means that "where K is the number of time constants required to settle an N bit accurate system"…
Part Number: MUX36S08 With a +/-10V supply to the MUX36S08 and analog input that can occasionally reach +/-25V, what type of input protection circuitry would be recommended ? Is a series current limiting resistor (e.g. 5K) sufficient ?
The Data Sheet…
Part Number: MUX36S08 Dears,
I have s product used CD4051 multiplexer, but I found the chip have a great leakage current when the input have power on. I don't konw whether the chip input construction or other reason.
And then, I have choose a high…
Part Number: MUX36S08 Hi
Would be MUX36S08's output Hi-Z when it was fault condition(e.g power supply was lost)?
I also would like to know about other MUX series.
Your reply would be appreciated.
Thanks and best regards.
Part Number: MPC508 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: MUX36S08 , TMUX7208 Hi Team,
Can this device to work in single supply voltage?
If yes, any performance difference?
Also, how is digital input VIL/VIH?
Part Number: TMUX6136 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TMUX6111 , MUX508 , MUX36S08 hi sir
may i know why the TMUX6136 rdson is 120 Ω
i see the ADI/ADG1613 only have 1Ω
or TMUX6136 have any key feature to fighting ADI/ADG1613?
The datasheet for the MUX36S08 actually shows performance using single sided and dual supply. You'll see the parameters tested at the top of the electrical characteristics section (Looks like 7.5 is dual and 7.6 is single). You'll see…
Part Number: TIDA-01471 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: MUX36S08 , TMUX6104 Dear Ahmed,
I have two questions related to this reference design.
1. In this forum thread , you mentioned the preferred multiplexer for the current source: MUX36xxx or MUX61xxx…