Part Number: MPC507 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: MUX507 , OPA177 Hi Team
I understand that MPC507A is “standard ESD tests” but can’t find ESD Ratings in the datasheet.
Could you please let us know ESD Ratings?
And, I confirmed MUX507…
Part Number: MUX506 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: LMH6570 , MUX507 hello,
I am using MUX506 in my design.
I saw in the data sheet that the BW is 500Mhz. There was no indication if it is depends on what power supply?
In simulation I am seeing a difference…
Two-channel 8:1 switches like the MUX507 require at least 12 V, and have a high Ron. I would recommed two single-channel 8:1 switches like the TMUX1308 or SN74LV4051A.
Hi David,
Thanks for sending that information.
I think you can accomplish this with one dual 8:1 mux, MUX507 , instead of two CD4051B-Q1.
MUX507 supports a higher voltage (recommended up to 36V) and channel current (recommended up to 25mA). The digital…
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: ADS8688 , ADS8698 , MUX36D08 , ADS125H02 , MUX507 Hi,
I need ADC for PLC input module to measure 0 to 10V and 4 to 20 mA. Minimum resolution should be 24bit and 8 channel.
We found ADS8688 but it is 16bit. Can you please suggest…
Hi Adam,
Seems like MUX507 meets our requirement, but just to confirm. Does MUX507 has Over voltage and fault Protection on Input channels?.
Thanks,
Kiran. A
The issue of measuring multiple resistors
- in the case of multiple resistors, differential multiplexer at the input, and another multiplexer for the current source would allow the use of a single current source, and single ADC.
- Suitable high voltage…
Part Number: ADS125H02 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: MUX507 Hello team,
in one of my applications I'm planning to gather differential and single ended signals towards the ADS125H02.
Since the signals have a dynamic of about +/- 20V I'm also looking…
Hello,
Thank you for the detailed information. We do have a few 2-channel 8:1 multiplexers (such as MUX507 and MUX36D08), but they are mid-voltage devices with less features, higher Ron, and higher cost, so I don't think that is best. Could you use four…