Part Number: THS6222 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: THS6012 , TPA6120A2 , OPA1602 , OPA1612 , OPA2210
The TPA6120A2 and THS6222 are comparable in terms of cost for in-loop composite applications. The former appears appropriate for a gain of 10, though…
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: OPA1602 I'm designing an audio circuit that needs 100 dB of gain. I plan to use OPA1602 op-amps with two stages, each providing 50 dB of gain. But is there a risk of oscillation with that much gain within one package? I…
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: THS3491 , THS4031 , THS3091 , OPA828 , OPA211 , LM4562 , OPA1622 , OPA210 , OPA1602 , THS6012 , TPA6120A2 , THS3121 , THS3120 What high speed amps can meet the following criteria on a ±15V supply?
ein @ 1kHz ≤3nV/rtHz
-3dB…
Hi Nilendra,
Due to high impedance load, and higher voltage rail compared to conventional headphone amplifier, I would suggest to look into Audio OpAmps, a couple options would be TPA6120A2 or some OPA16xx (like OPA1602).
https://www.ti.com/amplifier…
Part Number: OPA1604 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: OPA1602 We were told the OPA1604 was a drop in replacement for the National LME49740. Upon testing a new build, we are getting considerable overshoot on a comparative circuit we used the OPA1604 on…
Part Number: LM833 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: OPA1602 , Oscillation question about inverting op-amp circuit(about LM833DGK).
The circuit is configured as shown in Appendix 1, with a oscillation of 0.54v for input(A) and 1.19v for output(B) (The oscillation…
Choosing the right audio op amp in different contexts:
Parts discussed in this thread: OPA167x , OPAx134 , OPA165x , OPA1622 , OPA160x , OPA1692 , OPA1611 , OPA1632 ,
With so many different audio op amps available from TI, it can be difficult to determine which one…
Hi Lukas,
We have a couple options for higher bandwidth depending on how much more bandwidth you need. For a very similar device with slightly higher bandwidth please see the OPA1652 . For a CMOS device with much higher bandwidth, but is currently only…
Thanks Paul
I have attached the circuit. I am intrigued as to why the +ve voltage rail is pulled down. I will order both the OPA172 and OPA1602 to try
Regards
Peter