Part Number: PMP20588 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: LM51551 , Tool/software: Hi expert,
Customer used LM51551 for application 9-36Vin to 54Vo/30W and referred to the PMP20588 . During the EMI test, the RE is failed.
Link: design files
Could you please…
Part Number: PMP20588 Can anyone explain what the purpose of parts D5, D6, C20 and R21 is on the PMP20588 reference design? I have circles the components in the image below.
Thanks,
Phillip
Part Number: PMP20588 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: LM5022 , TL431 , TL431LI Hi,
I'm a student in electronics and for a project i made an exact copy of the reference design PMP20588.
After soldering I fail to get any voltage after the transfo.
Some…
Part Number: PMP20588 Hello team!
Do we have a reference design similar to PMP20588, but with using 220VAC as an input and with 70Wt output power?
Thanks for support ahead of time.
Part Number: PMP20588 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: LM5022 , Good morning,
I'm developing some isolated flyback supplies and I'm using the PMP20588 as a reference. I actually designed and built up a small board with the reference design (with…
Part Number: PMP20588 I have a question about the flyback converter on the PMP20588 reference board. The schematic for the board lists an input of 12VDC +/-10% but under Parametrics here => http://www.ti.com/tool/PMP20588 it lists a Vmin of 10.8VDC…
Part Number: PMP20588 Tool/software: WEBENCH® Design Tools Dear Sir/Madam,
We are using PMP20588 PoE, in that we need to Turn ON the RJ45 LAN connector LED's in according to PD detection and Data.
In that provision is there for PD detection,solution…
Part Number: TPS23861 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: PMP20588 Tool/software: WEBENCH® Design Tools Dear Sir/Madam
we are using PMP20588 design.
In this for driving the LED's in RJ-45 LAN connector, we need a Ethernet Controller.
Please provide solution…
Hi Mortiz,
Customer referred a similar reference design PMP20588 and the transformer Pri: Sec is 1:5.
The transformer customer used Pri:Sec PL3254-001SR_SPEC_A.pdf is also 1:5(not 1:1).
Could you please review again what might be wrong?
Thanks,
Allan