Part Number: PMP20859 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TPS2372 Hi,
I would like to ask why R35 is configured to 27.4k ohms? This contradicts the TPS2372 datasheet which recommends 24.9k ohms.
Part Number: PMP20859 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TPS3808 , TPS2372 , TPS2373 Hi Experts,
I have a few questions regarding this design:
Why is there a need for the UVLO of the converter to be pulled low by Q9? I thought that unless the inrush phase…
Part Number: TPS2373 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TPS2378 , TPS2372 , PMP20859
Below redundant PD is for .bt, if I want to implement .at version just change the TPS2372 to TPS2378, right?
Or you have better total solution or reference design…
Part Number: PMP20859 Hi experts,
As we know PMP20859 can support up to 3 inputs, two are PSE, one is DC Jack.
Now customer is going to use PMP20859 as base to modify for their customer.
1. They would like to remove DC Jack, what components can be…
Part Number: PMP20859 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TPS2373 , Hello Sirs,
Just need to double check this PMP20859 .(two tps2373 + single isolation flyback )
Is it no problem for two PSE input redundant power input , and system still working without power…
Part Number: PMP20859 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TPS2372 What are the benefits of using TPS2372 (PoE High-Power PD Interface with Automatic MPS & Autoclass) in the implementation of a “smooth transition” PoE PD reference design?
Part Number: TPS2378 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: PMP20859 , TPS2372 Dear team
The customer's PD application will have two POE input(back side and bottom side), the application condition : The POE input will source by different PSE device. But …
This is expected behavior. Having the output voltage never drop is called "smooth transition" or "hitless failover" in PoE market.
Please see the following materials for training on this topic: