Part Number: SRC4392 Hi
We are currently using SRC4392 into our design, andwe have an issue with the frequency response of SRC4392.
SRC4392 is used with the following configuration
DIR -> ASRC -> PORTb
Slave mode, LRClk=192kHz, BClk=12.288MHz…
Part Number: SRC4392 Tool/software: Hi,
Do you have any recommendations for reducing conducted and radiated emissions on the AES outputs?
Regards,
Graham
Part Number: SRC4392 Tool/software: Hi,
We are using 4 of the the SRC4392 parts in series (using same interrupt line) and trying to detect lock/unlock of the data.
I've got this set up on a rising edge, and can detect which part has the lock, but…
Part Number: SRC4392 Tool/software: Hello,
Our customer is evaluating SRC4392 DIT performance.
On the datasheet specified jitter as 200ps(typ), our measurement result is way high as 1900ps = 16.7mUI at fs 48KHz.
How can we improve this characteristic…
Part Number: SRC4392 We are designing a board using 4 x SRC4392, all as both DIR and DIT. We would like to make sure the DIT outputs of all 4 devices are synchronised (the source data will have the same MCLK, BCLK, LRCLK).
From the datasheet it looks…
Part Number: SRC4392 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: SRC4192 Tool/software: Hi,
We are using an SRC4392 and trying to set the RXAMLL (Receiver Automatic Mute for Loss of Lock) bit to get the device to mute when there is a loss of lock.
However…
Part Number: SRC4392 I'm feeding the same signal to two SRC4392, which are also fed with the same reference clock signals.
I notice that after every reset, the latency of the SRCed signals between the two chips is slightly different.
Is there a way…
Part Number: SRC4392
Tool/software:
Hi,
If I only want to use one input on the SRC4392 is there anything I should do in the hardware design with the un-used inputs?
If I'm not using the output at all is there anything I should do in the hardware…
Part Number: SRC4392
Hi Sir,
In the slave mode, How do set the registers to get the input and output to have the same sample rate?
My customer can use the 48KHz in the input and output, but they used the 96KHz in the input and only got the 48KHz…
