Part Number: THVD1410 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: SN65HVD82
I have found a lot of incosistent document in this theme. I would like to clarify them.
1. First time, I need have clarify the typos in documents. Please confirm that TI's guide has a…
Part Number: THVD1410 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: THVD1419 Hello team,
Could you please let me know if it is possible to realize half/full duplex switching solution by using two THVD1410?
Please find the schematic from the internal link here. (Please…
Part Number: THVD1410 Hi All, I need to replace the MAX13487EESA+ . Using the cross ref tools I see many alternatives. My customer cares about cost, room on PCB and he's looking for a transceiver RS485 with integrated autodirection. Can you suggest me…
Part Number: THVD1410 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: SN65HVD78 I am trying to understand where the 4000 foot (1200 m) maximum cable length comes from in the RS-485 standard. I have looked at various application notes and there is only reference to the…
Part Number: THVD1452 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: THVD1450 , THVD1410 , Hello,
When A and Y , B and Z of THVD1452D are shorted, it looks like THVD1410/THVD1450.
Is there any problem with using THVD1452 as a device for half-duplex communication in this…
Part Number: THVD1410 We are using TI RS485 drivers to implement a local half-duplex RS485 communication bus between adjacent boards. Unfortunately, at ~50C, the RS485 interface stops communicating. At first we thought the absence of termination might…
Part Number: THVD1410 Hi,
Customer is looking for p2p & b2b solution compare to MAX13487EESA
Cross reference doesn't show the p2p solution, do we have any p2p compatible parts?
Thanks!
Best Regards,
Patty Chuang
Part Number: THVD1410 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: SN65HVD10 , , THVD1512 , THVD1450 , THVD1451 , THVD1550 Hi, Good day. I hope everything is fine. Our customer is looking for the part-to-part skew [tsk(pp)] for THVD1410 as this information is not available…
Part Number: THVD1410
Hi,
I think that not "RE" but "DE" is correct related to following.
Is this typo?
If yes, are "tpzh" and "tpzl" value correct?
Best Regards,
Kuramochi