Part Number: TPS650864 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TIDA-01393 , CSD87381P
Hi,
How the inductor is chosen in TIDA-01393? I thinks there must be design goals and calculations, but the design doesn't show it. Particularly for BUCK2 and BUCK6, in…
Part Number: TIDA-01393 Dear Team,
I will use Design Guide: TIDA-01393 Power Reference Design for Xilinx® Zynq® UltraScale+ .
Could you give estimated cost for the BOM of the design.
Thanks
James
Part Number: TIDA-01393 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TPS650864 Hello TI experts,
My customer now checks TIDA-01393 for using Xilinx Zynq Ultrascale XCZU11EG.
as you know there is TPS6508641 in TIDA-01393, but I think it is little different from…
Part Number: TIDA-01393 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TPS650864 Hello,
Figure-32 of TIDA-01393 indicates Output voltage vs Time for various rails but doesn't talk about the load on the rails. Can you please shed some light on the load applied (if…
Hello Satoshi-san,
1. This question may be better directed to AMD for the consequences the rise time has on the Zynq device. Apologies, but Texas Instruments would not have the details on the Zynq device reliability.
I can say that our reference design…
Part Number: TPS650864 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TIDA-01393 , CSD87381P I am designing a PMIC for the Zynq UltraScale+ MPSoC XCZU11EG, and I am confused about calculating the inductor, RILIM, and output capacitor values for BUCK1, BUCK2, and BUCK6…
Part Number: TPS650864 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TIDA-01393 Hello everyone,
I am looking for a power management solution from the TI product line for my custom board, which integrates both a Virtex UltraScale+ and an RFSoC in a single design…
Hi Hieu,
We do not have a direct part number that can support this processor, however we have other solutions that fall into the Zynq UltraScale+ MPSoC applications. Assuming the power tree is similar to what we have existing we can reference an existing…
Hi Shota-san,
For general recommended connections of unused pins, please refer to the TPS65086x Schematic Checklist .
1. Yes, If I2C is unused, then SDA and SCL should be pulled up to a valid source with pullup resistors.
2. I would advise using…
Hi Prema,
Have you also checked the TI reference design layout that uses this device? https://www.ti.com/tool/TIDA-01393
This may be a better reference than the EVM.
Best regards,
Matt
