Part Number: TIDC-01005 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: CC3220SF-LAUNCHXL Hi,
I installed the simplelink_sdk_wifi_plugin_4_20_00_10 and TIDC-01005 SW.
TIDC-01005 SW requires 22.214.171.124 but I couldn't find it. So I installed latest version.
Part Number: CC3220S-LAUNCHXL Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TIDC-01005 , UNIFLASH , CC3220S Hi TI Wifi Experts,
I am working on bringing up TIDC-01005. first i have download and installed all the SDK match to the user guilde.
I loaded the Premade UniFlash…
Part Number: CC3220MODA Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TIDC-01005 , CC2640 Hi,
When we are using tidc-01005 with CC3220/CC2640, and following the guide to build it up then encounter high power issue around 7-8mA.
Originally we though this may BT issue…
Part Number: TIDC-01005 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: SIMPLELINK-CC32XX-SDK , CC3220S , CC2640R2F Tool/software: Code Composer Studio Hi, I am following the instructions in this pdf ( www.ti.com/.../tidue59.pdf) to start to work with this solution ( http…
Part Number: CC3220SF Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TIDC-01005 , CC3220S , UNIFLASH Hello,
I am working on CC3220sf and building my application on TIDC-01005 WIFI door lock reference design software.
As we are in a stage we need to check for the power…
Part Number: CC3220S-LAUNCHXL Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TIDC-01005
My customer is having issues connecting to AWS.
We are testing the wifi doorlock using TIDC-01005
I installed the SDK and tools following the design guide in TIDC-01005.
Part Number: CC3220S-LAUNCHXL Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TIDC-01005 Hi,
I tried to build project according to TIDC-01005.
But I get an error message as below.
"C:/ti/simplelink_cc32xx_sdk_2_40_02_00/source/ti/net/ota/otauser.h", line 115: fatal error…
Part Number: CC3220S Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TIDC-01005 Hi,
My customer is testing using the CC3220SF_LAUNCHXL and the TIDC-01005 to connect to Amazon Web Servers.
However, it is not connected and an MQTT error occurs.
First, My customer downloaded…
Hi Clément ,
I just got new update from customer side, we did a little experiment that change MRDY as output, SRDY as input, if we dont run SAP_OPEN, the power consumption will under 1mA. So we found that the issue is due to when Wi-Fi side run…