Part Number: TIDM-02007 Hi Team,
I am using this design to make plans for clients. At present, I want to make sure that M1_BASE_CURRENT has a corresponding relationship with iq. If iq_ref=0.1 is set in LEVEL3, then the current output by the motor is…
Part Number: TIDM-02007 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: LAUNCHXL-F28379D , BOOSTXL-3PHGANINV Hi team:
I am using the TI design "Dual-axis servo drive with fast current loop (FCL) control reference design" to run the motors.
All materials are purchased…
Part Number: TMS320F28P559SJ-Q1 Tool/software: Hello,
There is a TI reference design involving, two motors on a single C2000 controller. https://www.ti.com/tool/TIDM-02007#description I was wondering if someone has experience with this design, and could…
You may refer to the example in motor control SDK if you want to implement the FCL for dual-axis that's the update one and is suitable to be as a starting project.
C:\ti\c2000\C2000Ware_MotorControl_SDK_<version>\solutions\boostxl_3phganinv\f2837x\ccs…
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TIDM-02007 , DRV8316 , DRV8316REVM , INSTASPIN-BLDC , C2000WARE-MOTORCONTROL-SDK , C2000WARE Hi Team,
My client is now using the TIDM-02007 based code and switching the driver to a DRV8316. This means that the way current…
You might refer to the reference design TIDM-02007 and have a look at the guide and application report accordingly that should have answers to your questions.
https://www.ti.com/tool/TIDM-02007
You can check the PWM output on the connectors of boostxl_…
Sorry. You are right, the maximum voltage is 44.3V for BOOSTXL-DRV8305EVM, I mixed the board with the other DRV8305EVM board.
This project is a very old project, was designed ten years ago. Seems like the DRV is not controlled with SPI and GPIO of LAUNCHXL…
Hello,
Can you take a look at https://www.ti.com/tool/TIDM-02007? That TI design supports both the LAUNCHXL-F28379D and BOOSTXL-3PHGANINV which you want to use.
Hi Team,
Thanks for the info, please can you confirm this applicable to TMS320F28335 also. In the documentation https://www.ti.com/tool/TIDM-02007 provided by you didn't specify TMS320F28335 .
Thank you.
I wouldn't say it is better with one vs. the other.
In general the C2000 CPU is 50% - 100% more effective MHz than Arm M4F for these type of control loops, but the Arm devices are often running at 50-100% higher clock rates so it effectively evens outs…
