Part Number: TL16C2552 Dear sir
Previously we are using PC16552D in our controller card but currently it was discontinued. In place of PC16552D we are trying to use TI16C2552 but it shows 485 communication error. So kindly look into this matter and resolve…
Part Number: TL16C2552
Dear Sir,
We were using PC16552DV/NOPB part in our existing product. Now as the part is discontinue , TI recommended the new one part (TL16C2552).
We replaced the old part by new but it is not working. we need assistance about the…
Part Number: TL16C2552 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TL16C450 Hi,
Recently we have change the DUART PC16552 of national to TL16c2552, Without code changes TL16c2252 seems work good, but one month ago we are starting with a problem that we don't understand…
Part Number: TL16C2552 Hi Team, Does TL16C2552 have power-on reset? I would also like to ask if there is requirement to control RESET at power-on. Best Regards, Yaita
Hi Bobby,
Thank you very much for your clear reply!
I will tell my customer that TL16C2552 doesn't have POR and it is not good to connect RESET pin to GND.
Thank you again and best regards,
Kazuya.
Part Number: TL16C2552 Hello,
PDN# 20190423000.3 shows the successor of the PC16552DV/NOPB is the TL16C2552IFN, the PDN tells: "Q = Same functionality and PIN-OUT as the compared device but is NOT an exact equivalent."
Can you please tell me the…
Part Number: TL16C2552 Hi Team, we are seeking for your assistance regarding the TL16C2552 Maximum Power Dissipation.
Looking forward to your kind response.
Thank you very much.
Regards,
Mark
Part Number: TL16C2552 Hi
Let me have a question about TL16C2552.
My customer wants to know whether is there any problem on operation, if a clock with the jitter inputs to TL16C2552,
The details are as follows.
We are currently studying clock supply…
Part Number: TL16C2552 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TL16C552 , Hello guys,
One of my customers is using PC16552 for their current products. If they develop any next product, they want to keep using PC16552 because they don't want big system changing…