Part Number: TPS22916 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TPS22917 , TPS22910A Tool/software: Hi expert,
Is there a version of TPS22916 with fast timing and no QOD?
Thanks,
McKenna
Hi Hayashi-san,
I apologies for the delayed response.
The key advantage between the discrete load switch and the TPS22916 will be integration. The Iq is very similar as in case of discrete implementation, power consumption will be very less (mostly due…
Part Number: TPS22916 Tool/software: Hi,
In my customer's configuration of their circuit with TPS22916, the customer connects ON pin with IN pin. It means VON = VIN.
Does this configuration works well?
Best Regards, Taki
Part Number: TPS22916 Tool/software: Hi team,
I have a customer with the below inquiry. Let me know your thoughts and thanks in advance!
"1) What is the max Turn on time at 5V? Datasheet only provides a typical number.
2) Turn on time is spec'd…
Hi Will,
We checked on this. here are my findings.
TPS22916 do not have backside coating option.
https://www.edn.com/dangers-lurking-below-wcsp-backside-coatings/ Here is an article by TI PE few years ago about the Wcsp package (also have information…
Part Number: TPS22916 Tool/software: Hi team,
Customer get a requirement for the bi-direction for load switch for battery application.
Their spec requirement as below:
Input voltage: 0~5V;
Current above 200mA;
When EN is HIGH, need support current bidirection…
Hi Arush.
I have a plan to change this tps22916 to SGM2572(SGMICRO) becuase of this issues. We already checked this IC can be replaced with TI chip in terms of footprint as well. chip specification is also very simillar with TI's. Thanks
Part Number: TPS22916 Tool/software: Hi team,
Customer would like to get a LS part with following spec, could you recommend?
- Reverse current block
- Separate Bias supply and Power supply pin
- Current above 1.5A
Thanks and best regards,
Will
Part Number: TPS22916 Tool/software: Is it possible to use 2 x TPS22916 in parallel to switch 5.2V with 3.5A max current? If yes, is there anything I should be extra careful here?
Thanks