Part Number: TPS22916 Tool/software: Is it possible to use 2 x TPS22916 in parallel to switch 5.2V with 3.5A max current? If yes, is there anything I should be extra careful here?
Thanks
Part Number: TPS22916 Tool/software: Hi
The input voltage is 3.3V, and loading 1A causes the instantaneous voltage to drop 0.1 to 0.2v. This phenomenon causes problems with the system. Is there a way to solve it with additional circuits?
Thanks
Part Number: TPS22916 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TPS22810 , TPS22811 , LM7310 Tool/software: For my wearable project I assume to use TPS22916BYFPR for switching the Resistor Voltage Divider (RVD) for 3x Zinc-Air (Energizer 675) cell ADC voltage measurement…
Part Number: TPS22916 Tool/software: Hi support team, I have a question about reverse current blocking in the TPS22916CNYFPR.
The IRCB threshold is -500mA, but does that mean that reverse currents of less than 500mA will occur?
Also, I think the above…
Part Number: TPS22916 Hello：
Please assist in conducting a review of the MC project schematic about TPS22916,
Due to the urgency of the project, we hope to receive feedback as soon as possible
Part Number: TPS22916 Hi team,
Could you help check if we get recommendation meet following spec requirement?
Load Switch
3.6V
VDD
1.0V ~ 5.5V
Vout
0V ~ 5.5V
R ON
Max.50m ohm
I SW
Max. 2.0A
Iq (EN…
Part Number: TPS22916 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TPS22914 Hi,
I want to design a circuit for battery charge and solid switch for system turn on/off,
1. when without USB_5V, than user use solid switch to on/off system.
2. when solid switch off, and…
Hi Sharu,
Yes, it looks like the circuit in the picture you sent would work well. I calculate that the respective TPS22916 will be disabled when only (0.0028 / 2 = 0.0014V / (2 * 0.6) = 11.7mA) of current flows from the higher to the lower voltage battery…
Hi Elizabeth,
Thank you for your reply, No, the measurements were not made on the EVM, but on our products.
Maybe I explained myself badly. There is no doubt that there is significant current leakage when exposed to light. No doubt. For us this is not a problem…
