Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TPS23754EVM-420 Hi
I have questions about TPS23754EVM-420 Schematic (slvu301)
Should I use diode (D13,D14) ? Could you pls tell me the reason.
Part Number: TPS23754EVM-383 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TPS23754EVM-420 Hi Team,
What is the physical size and PCB layer for TPS23754EVM-420 and TPS23754EVM-383? Thanks.
Best regards,
Andy Chu
Part Number: TPS23754
Hi experts,
My customer is using TPS23754 in a new design, so far, They found a few of their board output is abnormal after running for a while. the output increased from 12v to above 20v, and can't reover from this damage. attached…
PMP6672 is the same design as the TPS23754EVM-420, with a few changes made to improve the efficiency. There is a new flyback transformer, synchronous FET and the delay timing has been adjusted. This results in a 3-4% improvement in efficiency. PMP6672…
Hey Ohad,
It is possible to have the TPS23754 switch at 650kHz with the AC coupled pulses to the FRS pin. However, The TPS23754EVM-420 would need to be completely redesigned. The transformer inductance is spec'd for 250kHz, so it would be inaccurate…
Hi Sammi,
Thank you for your question.
Could you please clarify which TPS23754 EVM that you would like PCB files for? Would you like files for the TPS23754EVM-420 or the TPS23754EVM-383?
Thanks!
Best Regards,
Brett Colteaux
Part Number: TPS23754 Hello,
Please help to review the SCH of TPS23754, output is 5V/4A, SCH is refer to TPS23754evm-420, just a little change, don't need adaptor input.
Part Number: TPS23754 Hello,
My customer using TPS23754EVM-420 , they find the Q2,D15,D16 temp have some little high at room temp condition, they need to build thermal simulation model, need to know Q2,D15,D16 power dissipation,so how to calculate it …
Part Number: TPS23754 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: PMP22301 , , CSD19534Q5A Hi,
I am considering creating a circuit using the TPS23754 device. The specifications are as follows. I would like to create a circuit based on the reference design PMP22301…
Hello Pjs,
Thank you very much for your question. Based on the input given it seems like a driven synchronous flyback topology would be an optimal choice for this design, since it does not require the secondary winding.
I would encourage you to look…