Shuai Yuan said: refer
sorry for the late response,
automotive components are preferable but not mandatory. So we can use TPS2552. Thank you for your support. We can close this thread as resolved.
Part Number: TPS2553-1 Hello Sir:
We studied the datasheet and found below descriptions.
"The device remains off regardless of whether the overload condition is removed from the output. The latch-off devices remain off and do not resume normal operation…
Part Number: TPS2553 Hi,
We are investigating the difference between the following two products.
Model ①: TPS2553DBVT-1 Model ②: TPS2553DBVR
There was a description that ① is Latch-Off Operation and ② is Constant-Current when limiting the current. If…
Part Number: TPS2553 Hi,
Would you please provide TPS2553 UL IEC62368-1 test report and certificate to me?
My e-mail address as below:
Jeffyc.yang@arrow.com
Thanks!
Jeff
Part Number: TPS2553 Hi team,
My customer is using our tps2553 and they us to provide the certification and test report.
I only find certification on Ti.com. Could you kindly send the report in private? Here is my mail as below. Thanks.
ben_su@ti.co…
Part Number: TPS2553 Hello,
Can you please confirm the following two statements?
TPS2553, TPS2553D and TPS2553-1 all have Reverse-Blocking function
The only difference between TPS2553 and TPS2553D is the operating temperature.
Thanks and best regards…
Part Number: TPS2553-1
I have a customer evaluating the TPS2553-1 (latch-off version) for one of their projects.
The Datasheet, and the information I have been able to confirm, seems to suggest the same thing written on page 17 of the DS.
"The latch…
Part Number: TPS2553-1 Hi
My customer use TPS2553-1×2pcs in parallel to control 2 input.
I think that this using method are no problems if one device is disabled.
If two devices are ON at a time, are there the problems?
Best regards,
Yokota …