TI E2E support forums
TI E2E support forums
  • User
  • Site
  • Search
  • User
  • E2E™ design support >
  • Forums
    • Amplifiers
    • API solutions
    • Audio
    • Clock & timing
    • Data converters
    • DLP® products
    • Interface
    • Isolation
    • Logic
    • Microcontrollers
    • Motor drivers
    • Power management
    • Processors
    • RF & microwave
    • Sensors
    • Site support
    • Switches & multiplexers
    • Tools
    • Wireless connectivity
    • Archived forums
    • Archived groups
  • Technical articles
  • TI training
    • Tech days
    • Online training
    • Live events
    • Power Supply Design Seminar
  • Getting started
  • 简体中文
  • More
  • Cancel


Search tips
Showing 9 results View by: Thread Post Sort by
  • TPS62293: MSL discrepancy

    Josel Go
    Josel Go
    TI Thinks Resolved
    Part Number: TPS62293 Tool/software: Hi Experts, Our customer is asking below regarding MSL discrepancy. The MSL of all sites shown on the ti.com is level 1 and yet we received two different MSLs. When did you make this change? For factory management…
    • over 1 year ago
    • Power management
    • Power management forum
  • TPS62293: Regulator

    Nirmal Kumar
    Nirmal Kumar
    Part Number: TPS62293 Tool/software: Hello TI Team, We have previously raised a failure issue related to the TPS62293DRVR IC. Recently, we received another instance of the same failure from the same customer. Upon analyzing the boards, we observed a…
    • over 1 year ago
    • Power management
    • Power management forum
  • TPS62293: Short observed in I/P and O/P of the IC

    Nirmal Kumar
    Nirmal Kumar
    Part Number: TPS62293 Hello TI, We are using TPS62293DRVR part on our power regulator section of the product. For your information, Vin = 5V, output voltage = 1V8, maximum load current requirement = 500mA. we have received customer complaint and take…
    • over 1 year ago
    • Power management
    • Power management forum
  • TPS62293-Q1: Evaluation Board for TPS62293-Q1

    Masaru Oinaga
    Masaru Oinaga
    Part Number: TPS62293-Q1 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TPS628501-Q1 , TPS62811-Q1 Hello, Team, Customer would like to take a look at TPS62293-Q1 but we could not find an evaluation board (EVM) for this device. Could you tell us any other board…
    • over 4 years ago
    • Power management
    • Power management forum
  • Answered
  • TPS62290-Q1: vs TPS62293-Q1

    Jun Ishida
    Jun Ishida
    Resolved
    Part Number: TPS62290-Q1 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TPS62293-Q1 Hi team, Could you let me know the difference clearly between TPS6229 0T DRVRQ1 and TPS6229 3T DRVRQ1? According to the datasheet, it seems there is no difference. Regards, J…
    • Resolved
    • over 7 years ago
    • Power management
    • Power management forum
  • Answered
  • RE: TPS61165-Q1: wide vin range

    Henry Wang3
    Henry Wang3
    Resolved
    Hi Sean, The TPS62293 is a buck converter, it's not a LED driver. My customer need a LED driver for 24Vin to 36Vout, Iout at 200mA (1-ch, serial the LED 12pcs)
    • over 5 years ago
    • Power management
    • Power management forum
  • Answered
  • Fixed 1.8V version output voltage tolerance

    TI Joern
    TI Joern
    Resolved
    Part Number: TPS62293-Q1 Hello Team, I would like to clarify what the output voltage tolerance of the fixed 1.8V version TPS62293-Q1 is? Page 5 in the datasheet does only mention the feedback voltage tolerance and footnote 4 is mentioning that the…
    • Resolved
    • over 7 years ago
    • Power management
    • Power management forum
  • Answered
  • RE: TPS62161: IC's are compliance with Automotive standards(AEC-Q100) or not

    Juergen
    Juergen
    Resolved
    I did not find an automotive version of TPS61253A, but this is not a buck regulator either. For 3.3V input and 1.8V fixed output voltage at 0.8A I would suggest to check TPS62293-Q1.
    • over 7 years ago
    • Power management
    • Power management forum
  • Answered
  • RE: TPS62261-Q1: DC-DC converter, TPS62261-Q1

    Chris Glaser
    Chris Glaser
    Resolved
    Yes, this is correct, but why not use the pin to pin, 1A TPS62293-Q1?
    • over 9 years ago
    • Power management
    • Power management forum

Didn't find what you are looking for? Post a new question.

  • Ask a new question