Yes, did also look into the TPS62801. Lets say there are other drawback...
I will stick with the low impedance resistor divider, even if it is not recommended by TI. When the 1.3V version becomes widely available I can use that one as a drop in replacement…
Hi Tino,
What Vout do you need? Per the TPS62801 D/S, this family only supports certain Vout ranges.
You can click 'request' on the page here to request the EVM: www.ti.com/.../tps62800evm-892
Part Number: TPS62743 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TPS62801 , BQ2970 Hello
My Customer is verifying the safety of this IC.
How does the IC operate when the VO pin(C2 pin) of the TPS62743 is open?
Is there any possibility of smoke or fire the IC?
…
Part Number: TPS62088 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TPS62821 , TPS62671 , TPS82671 , TPS62801 , Hi,
I would like to use an output inductor with 1 μF, but are there recommended values for output capacitors and other parts?
Best Regards, Yuto Sakai
Hi Dan,
This is not recommended. These devices were not designed to handle what is now a normal 5V USB input.
Another very small device with 1.1Vout is the TPS62801. TPS62743 can give 1.2Vout.
Hi Philipp,
In 100% mode and with less than 0.7V between Vin and Vout, we recommend to remain below 100 mA output current. The Rdson of this device makes the output voltage drop as well.
To overcome this, we need a higher current device like TPS62801…
Hi Dibin,
Nick correctly addressed why the recommended operating conditions table is written that way: this device has a higher Rdson which prohibits meeting the requirements of some higher current, lower dropout applications. Let us know if there is…
Hi Pragash,
Optimizing the power consumption by turning off various rails and maintaining the smallest size are conflicting design goals. However, we have solutions that can do either, so you can choose what is best for your application.
Do you have…