Part Number: TPS65132 Hi Team,
Is it okay if a voltage of 3.3V or 5.0V is applied to the I2C pin of the TPS65132 when the power is off?
If so, is the pin in a high-impedance state?
In other words, will other devices connected to the same I2C line…
Part Number: TPS65132S Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TPS65130 , TPS65131 We need to supply two micro-OLED displays. Here is a total tally of their combined power supply requirements: AVDD : +6.2V / 150mAmax AVEE : -6.0V / 150mAmax VDDI : 1.80V / 100mAmax…
Part Number: TPS65132 Tool/software: I am using the TPS65132AYFFR for the rails on my project. Currently, I am using the evaluation board and setting the output to +/- 5.4 volts. In my final design, I will be using the TPS65132 chip. I know that footprint…
Part Number: TPS65132 Hi,
Please provide the package information (package outline) for TPS65132W (RVC20).
It was not listed in the datasheet.
Thank you.
Part Number: TPS65132 Tool/software: We are using TPS65132W in the 80mA mode. But, 80mA is on the edge for our application, and we'd like to design a bit of a reserve.
Any recommendations / insights on how to go about it?
Our first thought is…
Part Number: TPS65132 Hi team,
TPS65132 has an RVC20 package, however, its dimensional drawing is not included in the datasheet. Even after searching on TI.com, we were only able to find the dimensional drawing for RVC19.
Could you please provide…
Part Number: TPS65132 Tool/software: Dear TI Support Team,
We are evaluating the TPS65132S and would like to confirm whether it meets the following voltage and current requirements for two different applications:
A Requirements:
VSP : +6V…
Part Number: TPS65132 Hi team,
I have a customer asking for the WQFN20 package dimensional drawing which doesn't seem to be available anywhere on the datasheet or elsewhere on ti.com. We see the picture of the package here: www.ti.com/.../mpqf234a.pdf…
Part Number: TPS65132 Tool/software: Hi team,
Customer is testing TPS65132S in their system.
They find the SOC output fall time timing is faster that spec, while it match I2C public spec.
Now, communication is OK, could you help check if this is…