Part Number: TPS65220 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TPS6521905 Hi, TI expert
A customer has a question while reviewing TPS65220.
Q1) The attached file is a TPS65220(PMIC) block circuit diagram, and we would like to request a circuit review before PCB…
Part Number: TPS65219 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TPS65220 , AM6442 , , Hello!
My project requires me to use DDR4 Memory with the AM64x processor. I am interested in using the TPS65220 as it is "Functional Safety Capable" but when looking through the…
Part Number: TPS65220 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: AM6412 , TPS22965 , TPS6521905 Hi All,
I have to study the most compact possible solution powering a SITARA AM6412 and I found some PMIC references that may be could suit the situation.
( the only interfaces…
Part Number: TPS65220 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TPS65219 Regarding TPS65220,
1. Whether the pre-programmed O/P voltages or sequence can not be altered from customer side?
2. Purpose of I2C is only for monitoring?
Thanks and Regards,
SUNIL P
Hi Kavin,
The AM64 EVM was developed before the TPS65220 53 NVM was released. The team had originally planned to use low bandwidth with lower output capacitance but was changed to high bandwidth to make the PMIC NVM more generic and cover a broader set…
Part Number: TPS65220 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TPS65219 Hi Team ,
we are developing a hardware based on AM6442ASFGGAALV. We have following initial queries .Please help
.we are planning to use the Pmic( TPS6522053RHBR) in our design. we need to…
Part Number: TPS65220 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TPS65218 , TPS65218D0 Hi team,
Please help to confirm whether the PMIC TPS65220 EVM & TPS65218 EVM is pre-burned. When we use it, we don’t need to burn it again and it shows the default register…
Part Number: TPS65220 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TPS65219 Hello,
Into this table extracted from TPS65220 SLVSGY1A – DECEMBER 2022 – REVISED JULY 2023.
I wonder if there is an typo concerning VIL max.
I2C standard define VILmax as 30% of…
Part Number: TPS65220 Hello,
If I well understood TPS6522053RHBR LDO3 default value is slow ramp up (extrat from SLVUCJ3 – FEBRUARY 2023) :
I've observed on my design (using latest version of TPS6522053) that ramp up time of more close to fast…
Part Number: TPS65220 Hello,
On differents versions of datasheet, there was 2 orderable part number :
TPS6522053RHBR
PTPS6522053RHBR
PTPS seems to be the pre-production version.
Is there a way to distinguish the 2 versions ?
By there top casing mark…