Hello Patrik,
Thank you.
The previous LDO used was an RF LDO.
TPS720 350 mA, Ultra-Low VIN, RF Low-Dropout L inear Regulator With Bias Pin
The current LDO is
TPS7A11 500-mA, Low VIN, Low VOUT, Ultra-Low Dropout Regulator
I see there is difference in the…
Part Number: TPS720-Q1 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: LP5907-Q1 , TLV702-Q1 Hi Team,
My customer is looking for an LDO to convert 3.3V to 2.8V for some really sensitive sensors, the 3.3V is bucked down from 12V supply (2.2Mhz switching converter), and…
Part Number: TPS720-Q1 Hi Team,
Good day.
My customer is not able to find TPS72009QDRVRQ1 pin1 orientation in the reel for the WSON-6 package.
This is missing in the datasheet, can you help me on this?
Best Regards,
-Renan
Part Number: TPS720 Hi,
I have the following 1.8V power supply using the TPS720 (see schematics below):
It provides the MGTVCCAUX power domain for an Xilinx FPGA.
There is nothing on the output power domain except an additional 4.7uF decoupling cap. …
Part Number: TPS720 I check the possibility of using the TPS72010 for supply 1V for DP83867 in my design.
The data sheet of TPS72010 does not describes the power-up sequence .
Hi,
Please advise,
In my design the input voltage of TPS72010 (1.8V) rises…
Part Number: TPS720 Hello,
can you please advise the efficiency level of the voltage regulator P/N: TPS72025QDRVRQ1 and if/how the output voltage can be regulated?
Or would there be another high efficiency voltage regulator available with an even higher…
Part Number: TPS720-Q1 Hello,
At TPS72029, my customer does not want VBIAS to source the light-load drive current when IN pin is left floating.
They would like TPS72029 drive the load only when Vin is available.
In this case, VBIAS still has to be greater…
Part Number: TPS720 Hi Webmaster,
My customer designed TPS72018DRVR SON package.
But I can't figure out any dimension specification in the datasheet.
Can you share me correct data?
Regards,
David
Part Number: TPS720
I am interested in learning more about TPS720xx in the DSBGA package. What is the reliability comparison for underfill or not underfill?