• 

  Southern Engineering

  • over 1 year ago
  • Power management
  • Power management forum

  TPS797: Ensuring we understand the output accuracy correctly

  • Resolved

  Part Number: TPS797 Hi, We are considering to use TPS797 , or more specifically TPS79733. One of its
• 

  Brian Angiel

  • over 1 year ago
  • Power management
  • Power management forum

  TPS797: Unused Open Drain Output effects on current draw

  • Resolved

  Part Number: TPS797 Hi team, I'm using TPS797 in one of my applications. If you have a unused open
• 

  Betty Guo

  • over 1 year ago
  • Power management
  • Power management forum

  TPS797: some mistakes in datasheet

  TI Thinks Resolved

  Part Number: TPS797 Hi team, I have some question about TPS797 datasheet. please help clarify it. 1. in the figure 5, the Vin=2.8V, Vout=3.3V. I think the Vout shout be 1.8V, right? 2. in the figure 11, can the TPS79718 output 3.3V to power MSP430...
• 

  EEngineer505

  • over 2 years ago
  • Power management
  • Power management forum

  TPS797: LDO Recommendations

  TI Thinks Resolved

  Part Number: TPS797 Helllo, I am looking for an LDO with: very low quiescent current (sub microamp) 1.8V 50mA max Small footprint Low cost in volume Only device I found is TPS797, are there better fits to my requirements?
• 

  Southern Engineering

  • 11 months ago
  • Power management
  • Power management forum

  RE: TPS7A03: Regarding Active Discharge

  Thank you for that thorough answer. 3. Parts with active discharge have this warning about possible reverse current damage in the datasheet, commenting that this risk of damage exists despite the active discharge feature. However, is it still correct...
• 

  Nikos Antoniou

  • over 1 year ago
  • Power management
  • Power management forum

  TPS797-Q1: PG Pin

  TI Thinks Resolved

  Part Number: TPS797-Q1 Hi every one, I design a PCB and I am going to use the TPS797 LDO. I don't want to use PG pin. My question is: Can I straight ground the pin and avoid the pull up resistor? Can I have common ground for both NC and PG pin?...
• 

  Nikos Antoniou

  • over 1 year ago
  • Power management
  • Power management forum

  TPS797-Q1: Capacitors

  TI Thinks Resolved

  Part Number: TPS797-Q1 Hi again, One more question.. According to the datasheet two electrolitic capacitors are required for input (0.1uF) and output (0.47uF).Can I use ceramic capacitors instead of polarized? Best regards Nick
• 

  Ryan Eslinger

  • over 4 years ago
  • Power management
  • Power management forum

  RE: TPS797xx N/C Pin

  Hi Don, Pin3 on TPS797 is not internally connected. This pin can be tied to GND. Very Respectfully, Ryan
• 

  Jeremy Brookley

  • over 4 years ago
  • Power management
  • Power management forum

  RE: TPS797 went bad, looking for cause.

  Matt, Did you ever find a solution to this? I came across it and was interested in what might be causing this as well. Do you have any external circuitry on the HDQ line when running the tests? My first thought is is there any way the battery was...
• 

  Ryan Eslinger

  • over 4 years ago
  • Power management
  • Power management forum

  RE: Thermal shutdown for Regulator IC (TPS79718DCKT)

  Hi Sumit, TPS797 does not have a traditional specified thermal shutdown. I did bench a device today and heat up the device. The output voltage decreased to 0V as the LDO heated up. Upon removing the heat it did startup again. This differs from a...

Didn't find what you are looking for? Post a new question.

• Ask a new question