Part Number: TPS7A78 Hello,
How can I calculate Inrsuh-Curent for TPS7A78 and steady state current? I want to know and calculate the minimum power rating and energy rating for the series Resistor Rs.
Can somebody help me?
Part Number: TPS7A78 Hello support team,
My customer asks what is advantage and disadvantage between full bridge and half bridge, could you support?
Full bridge can achieve same load current with smaller cap, what is disadvantage on full bridge? …
Part Number: TPS7A78 Hi, another Question regarding TPS7A78:
Is it possible to bridge Charge-Pump? Or asked in another way:
Can I provide external Input-Voltage for VLDOIN and what is the highest voltage I can apply?
I want to use the Voltage…
Part Number: TPS7A78 Hello Support team,
My customer would like to reduce AC line input cap Cs from 0.47uF to 0.22uF. Do you see any risk for lower cap, except lower output current?
Thanks,
Koji Ikeda
Part Number: TPS7A78 Hi,
My customer using MPS MP100L, if I want provide alternative part. Do you have better suggestion?
TPS7A78 seems only can provide up to 5V output voltage.
https://www.monolithicpower.com/en/documentview/productdocument/index…
Part Number: TPS7A78 Dear TI Team
Please tell us about the following contents about TPS7A78.
1. Our customers are considering using TPS7A78 to meet IEC 60335-1. At that time, I think that Cap-Drop Capacitor (Cs) needs to select a capacitor that satisfies…
Part Number: TPS7A78
Team,
The TPS7A78 is used for a load that takes 80mA on average, but also 280mA for peaks of about 500µs. Since the TPS7A78 limits the output current, a 4700µF electrolytic capacitor was placed at the LDO_out. On LDO_in a capacitor…
Part Number: TPS7A78 Hello
we have problems wiith EMC Conducted Emission EN 55014-1 Cond. with TPS7A78.
We have the following component values:
Rs = 330R
Cs = 470nF
CScin = 470uF + 180uF
Csc1 = 1uF
Csc2 = 1uF
CLDOIn = 10uF
To reach…
Part Number: TPS7A78 Hello Support team,
Datasheet recommend PFD top resistor divider up to 200k ohm, but, the value on EVM is 2.21Mohm. Does EVM have wrong design? Please clarify it.
Thanks,
Koji Ikeda