Part Number: TS5A3159-EP Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TS5A3159-Q1 Hi Experts,
I was looking for the thermal resistance of the part TS5A3159MDBVREP and I found this link:
TS5A3159-EP: Thermal Data for TS5A3159MDBVREP ...
Bryan mentioned that we can…
Part Number: TS5A3159-EP Hi,
I would like to know the max allowable junction temperature, junction-board thermal resistance and junction-case thermal resistance for TS5A3159MDBVREP . Thanks in advance.
Best, Prathik Devalla
Part Number: TS5A3159-EP Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TPS54260 Dear Team,
There is good new that we DIN the TPS54260 in customer's new project.
Customer have some questions as below, could you help to support it?
1. If we don't give V+ voltage,…
Part Number: TS5A3159-EP Hello,
What are the operating range and the absolute Max rating of TS5A3159-EP's junction temperature? They are not written in the data sheet, unfortunately.
Best regards, Shinichi Yokota
Part Number: TS5A3159-EP Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TS5A3159 Hi,
Is there an internal connection between the COM and GND pins on the subject PN?
Thank you,
HSG
Hi Clemens
1. I need a switching voltage of 1.4V ~ 1.8V, Is there a more suitable PN to recommend?
2. TS5A3159-EP is EP PN,if have no EP but have a wider temperature range?
Part Number: TS5A3159-EP Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TINA-TI , Tool/software: TINA-TI or Spice Models
Is there a LTSPICE model for part:
TS5A3159-EP ?
I have been using very primitive model {.model MySwitch SW(Ron=1.5 Roff=10Meg Vt=.5 Vh=0.1 Lser…
Hi Michelle,
The device is available in catalog/automotive/Enhanced product category but has not gone through any special certification process.
We do not specify the operating RH for devices but we do provide the qualification information and conditions…
Hello Andy,
second question - do you see any problem if I will use this analog switch -TS5A3159-EP? I know that these should be used for analog switching, but it's current rating seems to be OK. I hope we will find best solution!
Thank you,
Jan
Dear Adam,
My rise time is about 2.5 ns, so 140 MHz bandwidth would cover the signal better, therefore you are right. Thank you.
Actually i am already using -ep version of this product in my design, therefore i find it easy to go on with the same device…