Part Number: ULN2803C Other Parts Discussed in Thread: ULN2003A , ULN2003AI , TPL7407L , TPL7407LA , ULQ2003A-Q1 Tool/software: HI Team,
We have a requirement to control the 5V based relays using Relay driver... Can we use ULN2803C Relay driver for…
Part Number: ULN2803C Tool/software: Hi,
Customer would like to know whether ULN2803CDWR meets JEDEC J-STD-020 regulation or not.
May we have your help to check? and provide relative document if there is?
Thanks.
Part Number: ULN2803C Hi,
We currently use the ULN2803ADWR to drive a 4-digit, 7-segment display board.
Due to obsolescence, we replaced this part with the ULN2803CDWR part, however, we found that it is drawing slightly more current, but the brightness…
Part Number: ULN2803C Tool/software: Hi
I am using this part in my design and for power budgeting i am not getting clarity on current consumption of this device. and how much voltage does this required. and if it is operating on 3.3V then how it is…
Part Number: ULN2803C Tool/software: Dear Sir/ Madam,
RE : ULN2803ADWR EOL device
We received the parts recently and the date code is 2314, which is over half of a year (Date:14 Sep 2022)for the PCN that announce the parts were discontinued. Is…
Part Number: ULN2803C
Tool/software:
Pins 10 and 11 of the ULN2803CDWR device, must be left unconnected or can they be connected to GND like pin 9? What happens if pins 10 and 11 are connected to GND?
Part Number: ULN2803C Tool/software: Hi Expert,
Please help to recommend suitable devices (P2P would be better) to replace ULN2803/ WSO-18/ NPN type/ Ioutmax=0.5A (From other competitor). Thanks.
Best Regards,
Ryker
Part Number: ULN2803C Hello, I am a bit confused. I have been using the ULN2803 types in my designs and products for years. Unfortunately I have not received any information that the ULN2803ADW is being discontinued. Now the question for me is whether…
Part Number: ULN2803C I've reviewed the data sheet and schematics for the subject part. As I understand it - this part has no suppression diode connected to Pin 20. Is that correct?
If you feel my claim is incorrect, could you please draw the path…