Part Number: F28M35H52C The datasheet the F28M35x found here: https://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/f28m35e20b.pdf
has power consumption summary with peripherals turned on. I would like more detailed power consumption information.
More specifically, what…
Part Number: F28M35H52C Hi,
We're working on F28M35H52C-based hardware development and planning to use UART0 for field firmware updates. Our problem here is that under current circumstances GPIO0 and GPIO1 are not available for UART0 as they're already…
Part Number: F28M35H52C Hello,
I'm trying to compile a code for F28M35H52C with TI v20.2.7.LTS having lots of linking problems
The same code has been always compiled with TI v4.9.9 without any problems.
Is TI v20.2.7.LTS compatible with the microcontroller…
No, the BUSY bit is only set when the CPU is trying to access the Message RAM area either for writing the data to be transmitted or for reading the received messages. The BUSY bit gets cleared in about 14 CPU cycles, so it is difficult for code to see…
Hi Ben,
I asked Ray Vincent to connect you directly with Gregory since you want to keep this discussion offline.
I am closing this post for now.
Thanks and regards,
Vamsi
Part Number: F28M35H52C Other Parts Discussed in Thread: UNIFLASH Hi,
I have a question。
After I modified the send function of can.c under f28m35 driverlib, I can't upgrade the compiled bin file。
Please help me solve the problem。
Part Number: F28M35H52C-Q1 Hi Team,
spruh22i_Concerto F28M35x Technical Reference Manual (Rev. I)
1. P 1627 25.5.27 Software Trigger Interrupt (SWTRIG) Register, offset 0xF00
The IRQ's number is up to 91 , but there is only 6-bits to represent? Could…
Part Number: F28M35H52C Hello, i am using the driverlib and flashapi to develop a compact driver for the flash,
my program is executed from flash, however the entire driver is executed from ram (including flashapi and necessary flash functions)
the problem…
Part Number: F28M35H52C Hi,
We would like to use the FLASH API,
currently we are following TI examples and copying the FLASH API to RAM,
we can see it takes ~6K of RAM,
would it be possible to somehow reduce this size of used?
1. maybe it is possible…