Part Number: LM5169 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: LM5164-Q1EVM , LM5160 , LM5164 Hello Experts, My customer is evaluating LM5169 by replacing device of LM5164-Q1EVM. Customer has question as follows. Would you answer it, please? [Question] Customer…
Hi,
Maybe you can use LM5160 similar to this configuration on the EVM.
https://www.ti.com/lit/ug/snvu408a/snvu408a.pdf?ts=1594747773454&ref_url=https%253A%252F%252Fwww.ti.com%252Ftool%252FLM5160DNTFBKEVM
You can use 1:1 coupled inductor to provide…
Dear Nitya, David,
Thank you for your support.
I simulated something with WEBENCH, it says that LM5160-Q1 can make 24V output with 24V input. Could you check the result below?
https://webench.ti.com/appinfo/webench/scripts/SDP.cgi?ID=16383B48957484B4…
Antonio,
Like Layne suggested the LM5160 is the recommended converter.
Id suggest a 1:1:1 transformer like the Coilcraft LPH8045 .
Please see AN-2292 for flybuck design guide.
-Orlando
Part Number: LM5160DNTFBKEVM Other Parts Discussed in Thread: LM5160 I trying to design below specification Flybuck DC/DC in the restricted to use LM5160 and 1:1.3 transformer.
⇒Vin: 24V, Vout_iso: 18V / 200mA, Vout_pri: -14V
The reason for Vout_pri…
Hello Leo,
It looks like you are using the generic calculator instead of the device specific calculator. For a more accurate result it's best to use: LM5160 Fly-Buck Quick Start Calculator . May you please provide a circuit schematic? What is the application…
Hi Sheldon,
LM5160 is suggested for your application.
Controller solution is not suggested as the load current below 1.5A.
Pls download below calculator for LM5160 Buck conversion
http://www.ti.com/tool/LM5160DNTBK-CALC
B R
Andy
Part Number: TIDA-03031 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: LM5160 , TPS2660 , TPS2663 , LM5146 , LM5145 , LM76005 , TPS54561 Hi Sir,
We would like use TIDA-03031 design in a 70W application.
Would you help recommend another bulk regulator solution?…
Part Number: LM5160 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TPS54302 , TPS54308 , TPS62933 , TPS563300 , , LMR36520 Hello,
I am working on a project requiring a large number of isolated, low-current outputs. I am considering several topologies, including flybuck…
