Part Number: TPS7A8101-Q1
Hi Team,
There is a good new that we DIN TPS7A8101-Q1
And there have one thing need your support! Please help check this SCH & layout, THX (please refer to attachment )
4477.Layout.pptx
Part Number: TPS7A8101-Q1 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TPS7A8101 Hi Team,
There is a good new that we DIN TPS7A8101-Q1
And there have one thing need your support!
When we tested the 1.8V output of TPS7A8101, we found that its rising curve was not…
Part Number: TPS7A8101-Q1 Hi team,
in the datasheet, it recommend Cbypass=470nF.
1. when the output short(Vo=3.3V), the FB pin will go to negative voltage. will the FB pin have power stress risk? Cause, customer think Cbypass value is large.
2. Do we…
Part Number: TPS7A8101 We are currently using the linear voltage regulator TPS7A8101 to clean-up analog power supplies. The noise reduction capacitor and the bypass capacitor are 470 nF like recommended in the datasheet. The start-up time is about 80…
Part Number: TPS7A8101
most of footprints supported by you are different from before,the tps7a8101 footprint downloaded and is translated by ultralibrarian,but i doubt that polyregion of top layer and top paste can be or not defined as one net ,gnd for…
Part Number: TPS7A8101 Hi:
I use TPS7A8101 for 3.3V to 1.2V. EN connect to VIN. But some product 1.2V output delay 30-50ms when EN is enabled while most product 1.2V output immediately when EN is enabled. Below figure is my SCH and test result(red is EN…
Part Number: TPS7A8101 Hi experts
My customer is working with an assembly house some circuit boards using TPS7A8101. Their vendor is testing the boards in unpowered conditions and is measuring a short from OUT to GND. Is this expected?
They have also…
Part Number: TPS7A8101 Hi
Please help me to see if there is any disadvantage in the design of TPS7A8101.
Compared to the reference design on the specification, the difference is that the capacitance on the NR and FB pins is different. We use 1nF, and…