Other Parts Discussed in Thread: RF430CL330H , TRF7960A , TRF7964A , TRF7970A Hello TI employee,
I 'm now working on TRF7960A to read RF430CL330H. Everything goes fine except the last cmd deselct the tag. When I send 0xC2 , TRF7960A have no IRQ signal…
Hello Martins,
Please note the CC2430 is Not Recommend for New Design. I would advise you look at CC25xx or CC26xx devices for your application. Also the TRF7960 has a much newer version the TRF7970A (TRF7964A if doing only Reader mode, which I suspect…
Hello Bhargavi,
For question 1:
The first 3 protocols you listed would be best:
1) ISO/IEC 14443-4 Type A;
2) ISO/IEC 14443-4 Type B;
3) ISO/IEC 15693;
For question 2:
The following options are available from TI on a reader perspective.…
Thanks Fredrik,
Since I'm quite newbie, having some doubts to clarify. I hope TRF7964A /TRF7970 can interface with Bar code scanner USB 2.0 with MSP430FR2632/MSP430F5529 micro controller in real time. MSB430F5529 is better for Bluetooth communication…
Hello Fawn,
1) We don't have an NFC embedded MCU, only NFC transceiver like the TRF7960A, or the newer devices like the TRF7964A and TRF7970A. Each of these require an external MCU to control them.
2) As far as peripherals go, not much else. SPI…
the driver for the TRF7970A is now inside the mainline Linux kernel - we don't have one for the -60A there, nor was one planned. see ==> www.ti.com/.../linux-nfc-trf7970a for how to get that going you could use the TRF7964A in reader or initiator modes…
Abhay -
the MFRC522 is for ISO14443A based transponders, similar to the TRF7963A (which supports ISO14443A and ISO14443B).
The RF37S114 tag is ISO15693 based, which means you should look at using the TRF7962A (if you only interested in that one protocol…
The RF430CL330H and -331H have been used inside the vehicle applications. (ISO14443B / NFC T4BT platform)
The MSP430G2231 or -G2553 also have automotive variants. (16 bit MCUs...we don't make 8 bit MCUs here at TI, only 16 and 32 bit versions)
could…
Hi Josh,
No worries, I appreciate you making me aware that the TRF7963A is not the best choice for receiving 4-bit ACK/NAK responses. Unfortunately the way it is working right now is not suitable for my application since I do need to be able to confirm…
