TI E2E support forums
TI E2E support forums
  • User
  • Site
  • Search
  • User
  • E2E™ design support >
  • Forums
    • Amplifiers
    • API solutions
    • Audio
    • Clock & timing
    • Data converters
    • DLP® products
    • Interface
    • Isolation
    • Logic
    • Microcontrollers
    • Motor drivers
    • Power management
    • Processors
    • RF & microwave
    • Sensors
    • Site support
    • Switches & multiplexers
    • Tools
    • Wireless connectivity
    • Archived forums
    • Archived groups
  • Technical articles
  • TI training
    • Tech days
    • Online training
    • Live events
    • Power Supply Design Seminar
  • Getting started
  • 简体中文
  • More
  • Cancel


Search tips
Showing 302 results View by: Thread Post Sort by
    Answered
  • RE: UCC39002: Power up logic when modules have current limit Hiccup mode

    John Griffin1
    John Griffin1
    Resolved
    Hi Mitchell, As you say the UCC29002/1 is not available in DIP package but for your testing it is possible to solder the surface mount package into the DIP solder pads. It looks like you can get samples of this part here: store.ti.com/.../1.aspx …
    • over 7 years ago
    • Power management
    • Power management forum
  • RE: Compatiblity of UCC29002P

    John Griffin1
    John Griffin1
    Hello Martijn, It should be possible to use the UCC29002 with this power module. I say should because the schematic for this module is not available. Normally there is a resistor between the + sense pin and the +Vout pin. You will need to measure this…
    • over 9 years ago
    • Power management
    • Power management forum
  • RE: UCC28950: Paralleling the UCC28950 issue.

    Tom Henk
    Tom Henk
    Hi expert,thanks for fast reply. I've read the discussion but some things seemed a little bit strange. Why can we not use synchronous rectification if we parallel the psu's? the designer in the discussion has a voltage range wich is at 80V but i had…
    • over 5 years ago
    • Power management
    • Power management forum
  • RE: UCC39002: Questions of UCC39002

    John Griffin1
    John Griffin1
    Hello Han Lee, You are correct about the voltage rating. For output voltages greater than about 12V the Figure 5 of the data sheet. The NPN transistor will limit the voltage on the ADJ pin to the voltage set by the value of the midpoint voltage…
    • over 6 years ago
    • Power management
    • Power management forum
  • RE: UCC28950 load sharing

    Bernard Keogh
    Bernard Keogh
    Kura Document slua610.pdf deals with UCC28950 startup into a pre-biased output, which will occur when multiple outputs are paralleled together. As shown on page 1 of the document, an external load share controller such UCC29002 is required to implement…
    • over 9 years ago
    • Power management
    • Power management forum
  • RE: UCC39002: Simulation model for load share and remote sense controller

    David Huang33
    David Huang33
    Hi User, unfortunately we do not have such simulation document for load share controller. I would suggest you can download the excel version or mathcad version calculator for the controller. it should be enough for the design. below is the link…
    • over 3 years ago
    • Power management
    • Power management forum
  • RE: UCC28951: Limited Power Control of Chip

    Colin Gillmor
    Colin Gillmor
    Hi Tim Glad you found my answer useful - here are my thoughts. 1/ If the input voltage is going to be greater than 105V then the UCC28951 is a much better solution. If the input voltage is less than 105V then it's a bit more evenly balanced and comes…
    • over 5 years ago
    • Power management
    • Power management forum
  • RE: UCC39002: Power module

    Colin Gillmor
    Colin Gillmor
    Hello Kai The UCC39002 is a general purpose load share controller and it can work with ANY power module providing that the module has a remote sense feature. If the module has a trim up/down facility then the UCC39002 can control it too. If the module…
    • over 7 years ago
    • Power management
    • Power management forum
  • Answered
  • RE: Implementing Redundancy in Power Supplies

    John Griffin1
    John Griffin1
    Resolved
    Hi, The statement you posted was taken from an old revision of the data sheet (SLU495H) and it not correct. It was corrected in the latest revision. I am pasting this line from Section 3 , second paragraph of the UCC29002 data sheet (SLUS495I) …
    • over 7 years ago
    • Power management
    • Power management forum
  • RE: PMP8740: PMP8740

    Roberto S.
    Roberto S.
    Hi Anbarasan, The connection between one primary full bridge and one secondary full bridge you showed looks correct. From my point of view, this type of connection works well only if the two controllers are placed on the same board, or the distance…
    • over 5 years ago
    • Simulation, hardware & system design tools
    • Simulation, hardware & system design tools forum
<>

Didn't find what you are looking for? Post a new question.

  • Ask a new question