Part Number: UCC39002 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: UCC29002 Hi,
I'm utilizing the UCC39002 current share circuit to parallel two power modules and was wondering if there are any design examples mentioning how to use the device when there is a "trim…
Hi Waseem,
I think that by "...bulk capacitance of the power supply..." you are referring to the output filter capacitance, right? (If I'm wrong please let me know.) The power supply's output capacitance should go before the current-sense…
Part Number: UCC39002 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: UCC29002 Hi,
I'm reviewing ucc39002 and ucc29002 for load sharing 2x supplies 48V outputs, 5A output each, and have a couple of questions:
What what are differences between ucc39002 and ucc 2 9002…
Part Number: UCC39002 Hi all,
I was going through the datasheet for the UCC39002 and I noticed an error with units for the output current in the Load Share Driver (LS) section of the datasheet. I suspect that this is meant to be in mA, but could you…
Part Number: UCC39002 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: UCC29002 Hi all,
I am looking for a model of the UCC39002, but I do not see any model publicly available on ti.com. Do you know if there is one that is internally available? Let me know whenever…
Hello Mable,
As I mentioned at the top of my previous reply, the "Iout" in this case refers to the output current of the LS-Bus driver. Therefore, "Iout,min" is the -1mA minimum current capability LS-Bus driver listed in the datasheet…
Hi Bruce,
It is good to know about R37= R38 = 560R, although 510R would fit the data even better.
Anyway, it is unfortunate about the fixed 10R in the power brick. We have to remove R1 in any case, so that it does not bypass Rsense+ inside the brick. Adjusting…
Part Number: UCC39002 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TPS2410 , Hi Team,
My customer uses TPS2410 to implement oring solution. However, it was found that when there is a voltage difference between two power modules, then only one module is working, when…
Part Number: UCC39002 Hi Team,
According to datasheet, Radj needs to large enough to keep the internal NPN transistor from saturation and keep I_adj below 6mA.
How about the maximum value of Radj or Vadj? Is there any limitation?
Regards,
Charles