This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

OPA310: PSpice model for OPA310S or OPA2310S (with shutdown)?

Part Number: OPA310
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: OPA2310,

Hello,

for the mentioned OpAmps I'm not finding PSpice models on the web site.

What is available there are just the models for OPA310 resp. OPA2310, which

do not include the shutdown function.

Are there available extended models from some other sources, or what is the

suggested way to model the shutdown around the basic models (i.e. including

things like delays and output leakage etc.)

Thanks,

Mario

  • Hi Mario,

    I had a customer ask a similar question last month actually, the link to that thread can be found here: OPA991: SPICE model for shutdown function.

    While it's a different device, the answer is the same. Our shutdown models are currently being worked on but we don't have any alternative models to see delays and output leakages. 

    However the OPAx310S datasheet has extensive shutdown characteristics that you can use to determine any delays and leakages. 

    Best Regards, 

    Robert Clifton 

  • Hi Robert,

    thanks for quickly replying on that!

    Ok, I see. So no simulation model as of today. As for the turn-on and turn-off times, I believe that it's sufficient for my overall simulation model to model this with an ideal switch at the output with an according delay in the switching.

    As for the impedance, the helpful document you did cite in the other thread (https://www.ti.com/lit/an/sboa367b/sboa367b.pdf) is stating that it should be modeled by placing a resistor and capacitor to ground according to the impedance specification provided by the data sheet. Do I get this right that this impedance has to be present only in the shutdown-state and not for regular operation? The same counts actually for the inputs and the parasitic capacitances as well, but my primary concern is the influence of the output.

    Greetings,

    Mario

  • Hi Mario,

    As for the impedance, the helpful document you did cite in the other thread (https://www.ti.com/lit/an/sboa367b/sboa367b.pdf) is stating that it should be modeled by placing a resistor and capacitor to ground according to the impedance specification provided by the data sheet. Do I get this right that this impedance has to be present only in the shutdown-state and not for regular operation?

    That is correct. There will be a different output impedance of the device will be different when it's in shutdown versus non-shutdown. 

    We do characterize the output impedance in both the datasheet and in the simulation model. Here's the output impedance for your reference: 

    Best Regards, 

    Robert Clifton 

  • Hello Robert,

    Ok. Nonetheless it seems not really possible to simulate the overall behavior by adding some external switches and additional impedances. I was able to manage that somewhat, but not without some dirty side effects. Problem is that the feedback is broken when the output is disconnected.

    So such complete simulations certainly require a direct support of the shutdown feature within the model.

    Greetings,

    Mario

  • Hi Mario,

    That's one of the issues we faced when developing a shutdown model. The transient change between going to and from shutdown is difficult to model. 

    Do you have any additional questions for me? 

    Best Regards,

    Robert Clifton 

  • Hi Robert,

    I'm fine at the moment, I think.

    Though, I did decide to walk around that matter by not using an OpAmp with shutdown at that place where I indended to do so initially. The point is that there is this fundamental issue that the OpAmp when brought up has to find it's operating state first. By definition, this is causing some "hickups" at the output. In some cases this might be tolerable, in some not.

    Anyway, thanks for your input on that matter!

    Regards,

    Mario

  • Hi Mario,

    Thank you!

    The OPA310S datasheet does have the enable and disable output response shown. 

    This should give a better idea of how it will behave in your system. Sadly, I don't think every device has these graphs in their datasheet. 

    Best Regards,

    Robert Clifton 

  • Hi Robert,

    yes, in the particular case of the enable-operation you actually see the problem: The intended output voltage according to the inputs is 0V and is being achieved after approx. 1us. But until reaching these 0V the output will be forced to -2.75V for 1us. So in case the net the OpAmp attaches to is currently at 0V, it is assumed to stay there according to the input conditions. However, instead it will be temporarily pulled to -2.75V just after the output is going from high to low impedance when the OpAmp is getting enabled. This is the "hickup" as I called it. This is not nice and is a fundamental problem of OpAmps with shutdown. This can certainly only be fixed through zero-delays (certainly not possible) or black magic (I guess difficult too Slight smile). I was not aware about that pitfall before this discussion here. Nonetheless in many cases this issue can be surely tolerated.

    Greetings,

    Mario

  • Hi Mario,

    Glad this was able to help you better understand the parts! 

    Best Regards,

    Robert Clifton