Other Parts Discussed in Thread: OPA355,
Hello team,
On datasheet, it recommends to use 10uF ceramic bypass cap. is this a typo?
Isn't it supposed to be 10nF?
Best Regards,
Kei Kuwahara
This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
Hi Kei,
Please see this thread for a good explanation: https://e2e.ti.com/support/amplifiers-group/amplifiers/f/amplifiers-forum/1275281/opa356-decoupling-capacitor
The recommended value in the datasheet is correct.
Thanks,
Nick
Hi Nick-san,
However, on the datasheet of OPA355 (Almost same device as OPA356), it says "A 10-nF ceramic bypass capacitor is the minimum recommended value;".
Are you sure OPA 356 needs 10uF minimum cap value?
Best Regards,
Kei Kuwahara
The linked thread does not actually say anything about specific values.
For high-frequency decoupling, you need 10 nF or so (a low inductance of the traces and package is more important than the exact value). The datasheet text implies that 1 µF is the larger value, so 10 µF is an obvious typo.