Other Parts Discussed in Thread: THS4567,
Tool/software:
Dear TI engineers,
Thank you for the helpful response on the TI forum. I’ve carefully read the following post:
https://e2e.ti.com/support/amplifiers-group/amplifiers/f/amplifiers-forum/1337724/lmh6551-validity-in-using-a-fully-differential-amplifier-to-amplify-a-photodiode-signal
However, I still have some questions and would greatly appreciate further clarification.
According to the discussion, it seems that using an FDA as a TIA is not practical in real applications. Is the main reason due to:
-
The transformer-based internal architecture of the FDA?
-
The difficulty in maintaining proper photodiode biasing when connecting the cathode and anode to the differential inputs of the FDA?
One point I’m especially curious about is that the THS4567 datasheet (page 1) shows a differential TIA configuration.
Does this mean that FDA-based TIA implementations are possible with certain devices like the THS4567, and that it is rather the internal structural differences between the LMH6551 and THS4567 that make it less feasible in the case of LMH6551?
I’m still learning system-level analog design, so I’m asking to better understand the design trade-offs.
For reference, the paper I’m currently studying directly connects the cathode and anode of the photodiode to the FDA differential inputs. The title is:
“A wide dynamic range CMOS laser radar receiver with a time-domain walk error compensation scheme”
I would be grateful for your insight whenever you have time.
Best regards,
Chanhui Moon