Other Parts Discussed in Thread: TLV2374-Q1, , LM2902
Dear team,
Could you please help answer there two questions?
Thanks & Best Regards,
Sherry
This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
Dear team,
Could you please help answer there two questions?
Thanks & Best Regards,
Sherry
Sherry,
The common mode voltage calculation formula is not correct for LM2902-Q1
The common mode voltage is the lowest voltage input , not the average of the inputs.
If the inverting input is 2.4V lower than the LM2902-Q1 supply, then the output will be correct even if the non-inverting input is higher than VCC - 2V.
Both inputs should be lower than maximum VCC rating for device safety.
Sherry,
There might be phase reversal. The key point is that the input transistors are cutoff therefore the input voltage doesn't not control output anymore. The output will be based on what the amplifier naturally does. Maybe high maybe low, although the majority will be one or the other.
2V from input to VCC is plenty to support 2 base emitter junctions and a current source. Higher than than that will eventually cause transistors to cutoff, turn off.
Hi Ronald,
Thanks for your reply!
You mean when Vdiff is large (>0.1V) , for example, V+-V->0.1, then I2 will get all the internal current flow, and I1=0, so the higher voltage input can be set any value as long as lower than the maximum VCC rating. Is my understanding right?
Thanks & Best Regards,
Sherry
Hi Ronald,
Thanks for your reply!
Now the condition is V-=VCC-2.4<VCC-2, so the negative input side transistors are on (as below). Due to V+>VCC-2, the IN+ cannot control output, and V+'s value is not sure, maybe high maybe low, so the comparator's output maybe 1 maybe 0, and this phenomenon is phase reversal, right?