This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
I'm wondering if someone can help me why our OPA4188 is showning SR limits of about 80KV/S (0.08V/uSec) instead of the specificaiton of 0.8V/uSec typ?
My circuit is a differential input gain of one using 100K ohm resistors. Circuit is shown below.
The inputs are sinewaves of about 9Vp and 4Vp for an output of about 5Vp. I have captured the positive input and output in the waveforms below.
Does load have any effect on SR limit on this Op Amp?
You have a low-pass filter in the feedback of the first op amp and in front of second OPA188 op amp with 1ms time constant (10k||0.1uF) which completely dominates the AC response by slowing it down. This is not how slew rate should be measured - remove the caps and see what happens. Please see below OPA188 large signal response with no filtering.
Marek Lis, MGTSSr Application EngineerPrecision Analog - TI Tucson
We are glad that we were able to resolve this issue, and will now proceed to close this thread.
If you have further questions related to this thread, you may click "Ask a related question" below. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
In reply to Marek Lis:
In reply to John Gray:
The typical slew rate of 0.8V/us specified in the OPA2188 datasheet is a boosted rate and thus artificially increased by additional current being pumped into the input differential pair that only turns-on when an inverting input falls behind the non-inverting input by few hundred millivolts (the change in the voltage at the input is faster than the native slew of OPA2188.)
The native (unboosted) slew rate is a function of the steady-state current biasing the input transistors as well as the size of Miller compensation cap: SR=gm/Cc; in case of OPA2188 the native slew rate is actually around 0.2V/us, thus closer to what you see in your application. Therefore, the distortion to your sinusoidal waveform, especially on the negative slope, is most likely related to the native slew-rate induced distortion which limits the full-power bandwidth of OPA2188 below what is shown in the PDS graph - see below.
The short answer to your question is no - you cannot change the inherent slew rate of the amplifier using external components; the current biasing the input differential pair is set inside IC. Reducing the input resistor to 10k would only work if the input signal is slowed by low-pass filter, which according to your previous statements is not the case here.
If you absolutely need the precision of OPA4188 and higher slew rate, you could possibly create a circuit using OPA4188 inside the second (faster) amplifier's feedback loop that would do the trick but it would be more complex and costly solution. Otherwise, you could try to use OPA4171, OPA4172, or even better soon to be introduced OPA4192.
All content and materials on this site are provided "as is". TI and its respective suppliers and providers of content make no representations about the suitability of these materials for any purpose and disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to these materials, including but not limited to all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement of any third party intellectual property right. No license, either express or implied, by estoppel or otherwise, is granted by TI. Use of the information on this site may require a license from a third party, or a license from TI.
TI is a global semiconductor design and manufacturing company. Innovate with 100,000+ analog ICs andembedded processors, along with software, tools and the industry’s largest sales/support staff.