Because of the holidays, TI E2E™ design support forum responses will be delayed from Dec. 25 through Jan. 2. Thank you for your patience.

  • State
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 2 replies
  • Subscribers 31 subscribers
  • Views 941 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Support feedback
Options
Options
Similar topics

This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

PCM1792a and OPA1632 together

Alexei Petrov
Prodigy 30 points
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: PCM1792A, OPA1632, NE5534

Hello.

I have some questions on application PCM1792a.

1. How much precisely it is necessary to withstand ground potential on the current outputs of a DAC PCM1792a (Iout pins)? If the potential changes in small limits - for example, from-0.1 volt to +0.6 volt, whether to degradation DAC parameters (TDH, linearity)? This question is connected by that in I/U circuit operational amplifier OPA1632 application is planned. How it fully differential it is necessary to support zero potential on the current outputs (Iout pins) by means of submission of a current of offset from an external voltage source through resistors.

2. Influence of an input current of the operational amplifier in I/U circuit DAC parameters is how much strong?

3. How much strongly influence performance of a digital-to-analog coder presence of condensers on the current outputs? I want to apply condensers to simplification of operation of input cascades of I/U and lowering of noises of switching of a DAC. The condenser nominal will be is in limits 4000-10000 pF between outputs Iout- and Iout+, and also 1000 pF between these outputs and the common wire.

4. Application in the i/U operational amplifier OPA1632 will provide performance of a PCM1792a?

5. Whether has sense to do separate power supply circuits for outputs Vcc2L, Vcc2R, Vcc1? I have a theory that a partite supply modulator stages will lower noises on an output.

Best regards,

Alexei

  • 0 in reply to Don Dapkus
    Prodigy 30 points

    Hello Don!

    Thanks for your recommendation.

    In the recommended document the circuit as in datasheet is used. I don't doubt objectivity of such decision and in its optimal cost. There are some arguments against usage op NE5534.

    1. In the market it is a lot of fakes and bad quality clones of this chip. It is almost impossible to find the original.

    2. There is a generated subjective judgement of community of fans of music - this op badly approaches for high-class equipment. In other words, he doesn't allow to implement all potential excellent DAC PCM1792a, according to huge number of people.

    For commercial project success I should consider subjective judgement of community.
    Therefore on my question the answer isn't received yet.

    I have developed the servo-amplifier circuit дла ground potential maintainings on outputs DAC. But from for short precision of resistors and as bias voltage the servo amplifier, there will be a small difference in potentials - about 10 millivolt. The absolute error of setting of ground potential will make +-50... 70 millivolt. Whether such error of degradation of productivity DAC will lead?
    There was one more question. How parameters of the filter after I/U the transformer are selected? Why in datasheet different values Passband Frequency for different applications are resulted? In other words - what least frequency of the Delta-Sigma modulator? What order (2 or 3) and type (Bessel, Butterworth, Phase Linear) the filter to select?

    Best regards,
    Alexei Perov.