https://e2e.ti.com/support/audio-group/audio/<p style="display:none;">blank</p>en-USTelligent Community 13https://e2e.ti.com/support/audio-group/audio/f/audio-forum/1655908/tac5112-help-configuring-outputs-of-codec/6389201Fri, 19 Jun 2026 16:35:00 GMTcb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:a96b464e-04d3-45af-94f1-123f145fef69Scott MonkI think I should be able to sort it out with these resources now. If not ill make a more specific ticket with wherever I get stuck. Thanks again Garret and Jeff. Have a good weekend.https://e2e.ti.com/support/audio-group/audio/f/audio-forum/1653235/tac5312-q1-how-to-enable-the-loopback-test/6389137Fri, 19 Jun 2026 15:33:00 GMTcb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:5e20c8b2-cb09-4f70-a3dd-3b366a4dc33fGarret GodfreyHi Hanbing, I don&#39;t see where the Page 17 writes to the mixer coefficients in the script you sent. Is this included? I provided the reference code above, which should be included in the middle of the script, before powering up. Best, Garrethttps://e2e.ti.com/support/audio-group/audio/f/audio-forum/1656620/ts3a227e-detect-headset-removal-through-a-permanently-connected-trrs-extension-without-glitching-audio/6389093Fri, 19 Jun 2026 15:02:00 GMTcb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:f8e921c8-77a4-4e95-8952-f64d9a2d5b7eNir GilgurHello Batuhan, We don&#39;t really have an alternate part here to recommend. The only current solution is to add another one for the headset. We do have an EVM for the part you are using, you can find it here . Yes, this is an expected behavior, but not ideal. You are hearing parasitic capacitance getting discharged. You can eliminate it using a termination resistor to ground on the line, or use the TS3A226E instead. It has reduction in click/pop noise feature due to its internal design. Thanks, Nirhttps://e2e.ti.com/support/audio-group/audio/f/audio-forum/1656582/tac5112-to-match-the-full-scale/6389047Fri, 19 Jun 2026 14:09:00 GMTcb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:ef5ecc26-cce3-43ab-9994-65c97c3c329aGarret GodfreyHi Ryusuke-san, 1. In general you should not write to Reserved bits. 2. There is not an official max/min value for this, but you can generally expect +/-10% Best, Garrethttps://e2e.ti.com/support/audio-group/audio/f/audio-forum/1651365/tac5112-distortion-when-after-disabling-and-re-enabling-dac/6389001Fri, 19 Jun 2026 13:29:00 GMTcb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:995ef4fd-0a62-4d1a-ad92-53d34ea8696eGarret GodfreyHi Yuan, Thank you for the details, I have shared my comments to the poster over email. Best, Garrethttps://e2e.ti.com/support/audio-group/audio/f/audio-forum/1647080/tas2505-low-audio-output-with-tas20505-digital-input-speaker-amplifier/6388987Fri, 19 Jun 2026 13:09:00 GMTcb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:3f223bcb-b8f8-480e-b3bb-6a5b556956c4Subramanian Gurusamye2e.ti.com/.../5545.seco_2D00_imx8mp_2D00_d18_2D00_b79_2D00_overlay.zip Hi, This Below dts file we using now, can you share the better volume level, or please let me know anything modify require this filehttps://e2e.ti.com/support/audio-group/audio/f/audio-forum/1656810/tsc2046-about-tsc2046-s-iec-contact-discharge-ratings/6388986Fri, 19 Jun 2026 13:09:00 GMTcb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:23ee74b7-42a7-40b6-b5a1-c2eb6766dd7dArash LoloeeHello , Usually any available information for a part can be found in the product page : under ordering and quality click on the Quality, reliability &amp; packaging data and the list of available information https://www.ti.com/quality-reliability-packaging-download/report?opn=TSC2046IPW Parameter Detail HBM Testing Performed per JESD22-A114 / JS-001 — classification referenced in datasheet CDM Testing Performed per JS-002 — classification referenced in datasheet Internal ESD Protection Standard ESD protection diodes on all pins Latch-up Testing Passed per JESD78 While IEC Contact Discharge (X+, X−, Y+, Y−) is not explicitly mentioned, I believe it is same as TSC2046EIPW (&#177;15 kV ) You might find the section ESD Protection Considerations in Application Report SLAA560 &quot;PCB Layout Guideline for TI Resistive TSC Devices&quot; useful to review . https://www.ti.com/lit/an/slaa560/slaa560.pdf#page=4 Kind Regards, Arashhttps://e2e.ti.com/support/audio-group/audio/f/audio-forum/1656920/tas6584-q1-what-reference-design-is-for-emi-compliance-testingFri, 19 Jun 2026 12:08:00 GMTcb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:6bbb2a0f-b298-468b-a1a8-d0a4fbc48c4bLevi RakesPart Number: TAS6584-Q1 Good Day, I have a few different sets of board files for reference designs and validation baords etc... Were the TIDA-020033E2 files the ones used for compliance testing? Thank you! Levi RakesTAS6584-Q1https://e2e.ti.com/support/audio-group/audio/f/audio-forum/1656620/ts3a227e-detect-headset-removal-through-a-permanently-connected-trrs-extension-without-glitching-audio/6388893Fri, 19 Jun 2026 10:32:00 GMTcb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:098c2598-61e4-4e37-9bdc-aee1a15d5910Batuhan KayaHi Nir, I have one more question. With the manual polling method (triggering det_trigger via I2C), I can successfully detect headphone insertion and removal while the extension is connected. However, every time I trigger the det_trigger during the polling cycle, I hear a brief noise/hiccup in the audio output. Is this expected behavior, or is there a way to eliminate this? Regards, Batuhanhttps://e2e.ti.com/support/audio-group/audio/f/audio-forum/1656620/ts3a227e-detect-headset-removal-through-a-permanently-connected-trrs-extension-without-glitching-audio/6388886Fri, 19 Jun 2026 10:21:00 GMTcb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:761cb564-17e7-4e44-a889-9eda097a026cBatuhan KayaHi Nir, Thanks for your reply. Yes I think the only solution is discrete muxes on each side but I can&#39;t change the system right now so do you have any alternative IC or circuit for this? Can you recommend app note or EVM for it? Regards, Batuhanhttps://e2e.ti.com/support/audio-group/audio/f/audio-forum/1653204/tlv320aic3104-auido-leakage-issue/6388854Fri, 19 Jun 2026 09:37:00 GMTcb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:e4f6da5f-1244-495d-8cb2-acd79df1c25dFalguni SharmaHi Jeff, Thank you for the clarification regarding the grounding strategy. I have a few follow-up questions: Could you please comment on the TLV320AIC3104 initialization sequence that I shared earlier? Does the register write order look correct, or do you see anything that could potentially contribute to channel leakage or crosstalk? Regarding the AGND-DGND connection, is there any practical difference between using a 0 Ω resistor and a net tie for joining the ground regions? I understand both provide a connection between the grounds, but I would like to know if one approach is preferred over the other for mixed-signal audio designs. For future revisions, should I partition the ground pours on inner layer1 into separate analog and digital regions as shown in your example. In my design, the codec is located between the digital MCU section and the analog audio chain. Is it acceptable for the ground split boundary to pass through the middle of the board near the codec, effectively separating the digital and analog sections, or would you recommend a different partitioning approach? I would appreciate any additional guidance on how you would implement the AGND/DGND partitioning for a mixed-signal audio design using the TLV320AIC3104, PGA2311, and TPA6120A2. Thank you for your help. Best regards, Falgunihttps://e2e.ti.com/support/audio-group/audio/f/audio-forum/1656582/tac5112-to-match-the-full-scale/6388836Fri, 19 Jun 2026 09:14:00 GMTcb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:c9977401-8dc7-40a0-a14e-a8e7e07453acR.FukunagaHi Garret, Thank you for your reply. I would like to ask two additional questions. 1) Regarding the Reserved setting of the ADC_PINCM_TRIM register Is there any issue, in terms of guaranteed operation, with using the setting “11 = Reserved” for “ADC_PINCM_TRIM[1:0]” in the “ADC_CFG1 Register (Address = 0x62)” ? 2) Regarding variation (tolerance) of input impedance For the ADC input impedance values (5 kΩ / 10 kΩ / 40 kΩ) , what is the tolerance (variation percentage) of these values? Best Regards, Ryusukehttps://e2e.ti.com/support/audio-group/audio/f/audio-forum/1644668/tlv320aic34-reset-flush-output-of-tlv320ai34/6388597Fri, 19 Jun 2026 05:15:00 GMTcb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:1c6bbee0-9683-4646-8ec4-685525fc77d8Mir JeffresHi Luke, Have you tried power cycling the device in between when you turn off the clocks as well? Or, maybe the chip has a power down of ADC/DAC register. I can check tomorrow.https://e2e.ti.com/support/audio-group/audio/f/audio-forum/1656812/tas5411q1evm-single-input-to-tas5411qFri, 19 Jun 2026 05:11:00 GMTcb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:53adba83-55b1-4e95-9c1b-2227e84a7c97Ajay KadamPart Number: TAS5411Q1EVM Hi Team, I have evluation module i.e. TAS5411Q1EVM. How can i interface Auxout Pin(from MPN:ISD3800 ; Make:Nuvoton) to this TAS5411Q1EVM https://www.nuvoton.com/export/resource-files/DS_ISD3800_DataSheet_EN_Rev1.5.pdf https://www.ti.com/lit/ug/slou431/slou431.pdf?ts=1781845793993&amp;ref_url=https%253A%252F%252Fwww.ti.com%252Ftool%252FTAS5411Q1EVMInfotainment &amp; ClusterTAS5411Q1EVMhttps://e2e.ti.com/support/audio-group/audio/f/audio-forum/1656810/tsc2046-about-tsc2046-s-iec-contact-discharge-ratingsFri, 19 Jun 2026 05:09:00 GMTcb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:e0cc377e-b9e7-4719-a6d2-1fdcd7d24c9cSEOYOON KANGPart Number: TSC2046 Hello TI Product Team, I&#39;am Kang.seoyoon from Team. Electronic Design, Canon Korea. We have been using the TSC2046EIPW@ in our product, but it is scheduled to reach EOL. Therefore, we are currently conducting tests to evaluate and apply the TSC2046IPW@ as a replacement in our product. While reviewing the specifications of the TSC2046IPW@ , we could not find any specification for IEC Contact Discharge (X+, X−, Y+, Y−) , so I would like to ask for your guidance. We understand that the TSC2046IPW@ may have different ESD protection characteristics compared to the TSC2046EIPW@. Could you please share the ESD protection parameter values for the device we are evaluating, and advise what level of ESD contact discharge performance is guaranteed?(IEC Contact Discharge RATINGS) I look forward to your response. Thank you. Best regards, Kang.seoyoon Canon KoreaTSC2046https://e2e.ti.com/support/audio-group/audio/f/audio-forum/1656502/tlv320aic3109evm-k-tlv320aic3109-q1-sinad-loopback-test/6388518Fri, 19 Jun 2026 02:32:00 GMTcb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:11b19ac7-734b-4829-9bd3-0e9129432809Mir JeffresHi, How are you measuring these specs? Using the AP or a scope? Can you explain a little? I know it is a lot harder to get an accurate measurement of these specs with a scope. I would recommend using an Audio Precision, or another codec to measure analog output and get the data digitally. Make sure the data is A-weighted and filtered at the Nyquist rate. I can test your commands on a EVM tomorrow to make sure about your config. Best, Mirhttps://e2e.ti.com/support/audio-group/audio/f/audio-forum/1656014/taa5242-power-reboot-wait-time/6388471Fri, 19 Jun 2026 00:56:00 GMTcb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:ec72560d-fd9c-4155-9cf0-0177f6cb8f4cToshiro ImiThank you for your feedback. I understand that the reason at least 100ms wait time until reboot AVDD, IOVDD, needed is for the time fully reset TAA5242. best regards,https://e2e.ti.com/support/audio-group/audio/f/audio-forum/1651365/tac5112-distortion-when-after-disabling-and-re-enabling-dac/6388465Fri, 19 Jun 2026 00:39:00 GMTcb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:9ce9a596-7e3c-4483-b0d6-5e4a46f29fe9Yuan Suang OoiHi Garret, TDM details as below: FSYNC is 8KHz, BCLK is 1.280MHz, Data width is 16, Total slot using is 10. we follow the below recomendatiom from TI still observe the distoriton. (roughly a 10% to 20% failure rate, or 1–2 times out of 10 tries). Speaker OFF: w a0 67 00 # channel 1 mute w a0 78 A0 # power down DAC Speaker ON: w a0 67 c9 # channel 1 0dB w a0 78 E0 # power up DAC Please advice.https://e2e.ti.com/support/audio-group/audio/f/audio-forum/1656740/tad5242-tad5242---bclk-jitter-requirements/6388439Thu, 18 Jun 2026 23:47:00 GMTcb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:d1d3506a-fd94-4d4d-96a8-7003f61d9d57Arash LoloeeHello Peter, The datasheet does not have spec for jitter but the timing constraints on BCLK , effectively limiting the acceptable jitter . Any cycle-to-cycle jitter on BCLK must not violate the minimum pulse duration or cause setup/hold violations on FSYNC and DIN. Regards, Arashhttps://e2e.ti.com/support/audio-group/audio/f/audio-forum/1655908/tac5112-help-configuring-outputs-of-codec/6388372Thu, 18 Jun 2026 22:07:00 GMTcb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:89100110-a064-4f3f-acfa-c9643ba95b23Garret GodfreyYou&#39;re welcome, please let me know if any further support is needed.