This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

TPA2025D1: Help or advice needed for a circuit design

Part Number: TPA2025D1

Hi

I am currently working on my first audio design project and it's for a portable haptic device. The output load is an 8ohm voice coil actuator. The TPA2025D1 chip seems perfect for the project as it's class-D (less heat dissipation), very small and doesn't require much circuitry around it (circuit area is a deciding factor). What I want to do is do some experiments and play around with input/output filters. I have been using this schematic of the TPA2025D1 Evaluation Module as reference:

In my design I leave the power stage essentially unchanged but I would like to experiment with the values of C1, C2, C7, C8 (skip C6) and would also like to see the effect of an LC filter at the output.

The fact that the TPA2025D1 is a BGA chip has caused me some problems as I'm not sure how to handle the prototyping. Originally, I had the BGA chip mounted on an adapter from Proto-Advantage to allow for testing on a bread board. Those tests proved unsuccessful as I could never get a clear output signal. An example in the image below:

According to a staff member at the Texas Instruments Live Chat, it is not a good idea to use a bread board for audio amplifiers as it's very susceptible to noise. Although I'm not convinced that the results above are due to noise susceptibility, I still think it's best that I change my approach. So what I want to do now is make a few PCB's that I can use for further experiments, with the TPA2025D1 and power stage components assembled and the filter components unassembled. Here is a sketch of what I have in mind:

Since the 0.5mm pitch BGA package calls for microvias and multiple layers, the manufacturing cost is pretty high. So I want to be sure if the design above will work and if I'm safe to assume that all I have to do is add input and output filters to play around with the frequency response.

I'd really appreciate it if someone with experience would review my design and let me know if I'm overseeing something and/or if my approach makes any sense.

  • Hi!

    I would suggest to take a look at our LC Filter Design Application Report. In this document, we discuss and mention some types of the Class-D filters that we use for our evaluation modules like the one that you referred in your previous post. This document could help you to have a better approach to the filter design and how the capacitors C7 and C8 will act in this output filter.

    http://www.ti.com/lit/an/slaa701a/slaa701a.pdf

    Regarding the C1 and C2 input capacitors, it is important to mention that they will create a high-pass filter with the input impedance RIN (see 8.6 Operating Characteristics section for details: http://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/tpa2025d1.pdf#page=5 ). So, the input cutoff frequency will be affected if the C1 and C2 capacitors are modified.

    In addition, if you are interested in haptics solutions for portable devices, I would invite you to check our haptics product folder, you may find some interesting solutions for your projects:

    http://www.ti.com/motor-drivers/actuator-drivers/overview.html

    I hope this helps you. Let me know if you have additional comments on this.

    Best regards,
    Luis Fernando Rodríguez S.

  • Hi Luis Fernando Rodriguez. Thanks for the reply.

    I'm looking to use a voice coil as an actuator instead of motor or piezo. That's why I went for the audio amplifier design.

    I was aware of the LC filter document and I have been using it for my calculations. The way I see it, the input capacitors (C1, C2) would form a band-pass filter along with the output LC filters. What I want to do is examine the effect of different pass-bands. To do so, I would need a test board where all I have to do is replace the filter components.

    So my question is, does my sketch look like it could work for that purpose? Also, is there anything else I need to take into account regarding the power stage design?

    Kind regards,

    Elvar

  • Elvar,

    Sorry for my late response.

    I think your sketch can work for this evaluation. It is similar to the design of our TPA2025D1 Evaluation Module: http://www.ti.com/lit/ug/slou310/slou310.pdf

    I would only recommend to ensure that the capacitors footprints could support different sizes for a more confortable evaluation.

    Regarding the power stage design, I didn't find anything to modify. It looks fine.

    Best regards,
    Luis Fernando Rodríguez S.

  • Excellent. My instinct told me it should work but since my other setup produced bad results, I was losing confidence.

    Thank you.

    Kind regards.