<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://e2e.ti.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Clock &amp; timing</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/clock-timing-group/clock-and-timing/</link><description> Products covered in this section are Clock Generation &amp;amp; Distribution, Memory Interface, Registers, Real Time Clocks and Timers. </description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><item><title>Forum Post: RE: LMK05318B: Request for Certificate of Volatility for LMK05318BRGZ</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/clock-timing-group/clock-and-timing/f/clock-timing-forum/1692081/lmk05318b-request-for-certificate-of-volatility-for-lmk05318brgz/6520084</link><pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2026 18:52:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:5b2fe256-6c21-457f-a9af-27ae0a629854</guid><dc:creator>Jaryd Dukes</dc:creator><description>Hi Wang, I will check with our product engineering team if we have this certificate and get back to you shortly. Best, Jaryd</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: MSPM0-SDK: MSPM0L1306:Is GPIO wake-up detection in STANDBY0 mode based on a 32-kHz clock or asynchronous logic?</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/clock-timing-group/clock-and-timing/f/clock-timing-forum/1691777/mspm0-sdk-mspm0l1306-is-gpio-wake-up-detection-in-standby0-mode-based-on-a-32-khz-clock-or-asynchronous-logic/6520057</link><pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2026 18:24:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:5fa2f8ef-ac48-411d-8879-9cae9c296057</guid><dc:creator>Brian Dempsey</dc:creator><description>Hi, thanks for the question. With GPIO fast wake enabled and asynchronous requests allowed in SYSCTL, the MSPM0L1306 can request SYSOSC without waiting for a 32-kHz sampling edge. However, normal GPIO input processing still uses a two-stage ULPCLK synchronizer and optional filtering. The fast-wake request is asynchronous—not the entire input-to-interrupt path, so this does not guarantee zero jitter. TRM &amp;#167;9.2.3–9.2.4 . The datasheet specifies 15 &amp;#181;s typical from GPIO edge to first CPU instruction with filtering disabled and fast wake enabled. It does not specify a guaranteed jitter bound. Also observe GPIO_ERR_01 for repeated wake events: deassert the wake input while the MCU is active before returning to low power. Its three-LFCLK-cycle restriction concerns rearming, not initial wake latency. Errata, page 14 . Hope this helps! -Brian</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: LMK03318: LMK03318 AC LVDS output skew if not in divider value</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/clock-timing-group/clock-and-timing/f/clock-timing-forum/1686352/lmk03318-lmk03318-ac-lvds-output-skew-if-not-in-divider-value/6520036</link><pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2026 17:54:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:03db45c1-ae39-44d3-8e24-800560c5cd84</guid><dc:creator>Brian Mace</dc:creator><description>Hi Li, Sorry for the delay here this got lost in my email. I have confirmed that the delay between divider values that are close is very small, but it is hard to give an exact value without knowing the exact divider values. We would expect that using different divider values shouldn&amp;#39;t add more than ~100ps. So the skew between outputs, even running different divider values, shouldn&amp;#39;t be more that ~200ps (100ps + 100ps datasheet limit). Realistically is should be much less (likely within the 100ps original spec), but we cannot guarantee that. Best, Brian</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: LMK1C1106: LMK1C1106 / LMKDB1104 / LMKDB1102 OLB file</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/clock-timing-group/clock-and-timing/f/clock-timing-forum/1692267/lmk1c1106-lmk1c1106-lmkdb1104-lmkdb1102-olb-file/6520025</link><pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2026 17:46:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:dee080a7-a357-4774-8744-7bf038b0f18b</guid><dc:creator>Nirmal Karthik</dc:creator><description>e2e.ti.com/.../ORCAD-Captures.zip Hi Sean, Attached is a zip with the olb files for each part. For future reference, you can find these on each part&amp;#39;s website. Looking at the LMK1C1106 as an example: 1. Navigate to the product website and click on &amp;quot;Design &amp;amp; development&amp;quot; 2. Select the header for CAD models: 3. Click on the UltraLibrarian Link to get access to the portal to download design files: Hope this helps!</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: LMX2595: Current Consumption</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/clock-timing-group/clock-and-timing/f/clock-timing-forum/1692260/lmx2595-current-consumption/6520012</link><pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2026 17:20:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:15d60661-4076-41ae-acdb-4acc93785803</guid><dc:creator>Noel Fung</dc:creator><description>Hi There, suggest use TICS Pro ( www.ti.com/.../TICSPRO-SW) to estimate the current consumption based on the actual application configuration.</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: LMX2594: LMX2594 ramp limit low and high</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/clock-timing-group/clock-and-timing/f/clock-timing-forum/1691983/lmx2594-lmx2594-ramp-limit-low-and-high/6519998</link><pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2026 17:04:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:43d8d0d8-e491-498c-ab26-0154ec75ec5f</guid><dc:creator>Jim Maynen</dc:creator><description>e2e.ti.com/.../Ramp-sketch.pdf We are configuring symmetrical ramps with frequency excursion of 10MHz up to 100MHz, and repetition rate of 500Hz up to 5kHz, or any combination in between. No trouble with creating these ramps, just want to understand any known limitations with the Fhigh / RAMP_LIMIT_HIGH setting. Thanks.</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: LMK1C1102A: LMK1C1102ADQFR : Output Enable of this IC</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/clock-timing-group/clock-and-timing/f/clock-timing-forum/1692118/lmk1c1102a-lmk1c1102adqfr-output-enable-of-this-ic/6519971</link><pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2026 16:34:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:80ea72c4-1748-427e-9460-55a2cae5c181</guid><dc:creator>Tristan Morris</dc:creator><description>Hey Ashwini, Unfortunately I can&amp;#39;t access your attached image-- it appears to have included the name of the image but not the image itself. A quick summary of how LMK1C1102A output behavior works-- if the output enable (1G) is pulled high, then the outputs will match the CLKIN pin, with some amount of propagation delay. On one single transition on CLKIN, you should see that single transition appear as a rising or falling edge on the output of the device, after the propagation delay. As an example, if you give the part a rising transition on CLKIN, you should see the output produce a rising edge. Thank you, Tristan</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: LMX2594: LMX2594 ramp limit low and high</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/clock-timing-group/clock-and-timing/f/clock-timing-forum/1691983/lmx2594-lmx2594-ramp-limit-low-and-high/6519963</link><pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2026 16:26:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:b9732a5e-dc84-496e-93d3-a38cc23613cd</guid><dc:creator>Noel Fung</dc:creator><description>Hi there, Would you provide a drawing on the ramp waveform that you want to implement?</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: LMK1C1106: LMK1C1106 / LMKDB1104 / LMKDB1102 OLB file</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/clock-timing-group/clock-and-timing/f/clock-timing-forum/1692267/lmk1c1106-lmk1c1106-lmkdb1104-lmkdb1102-olb-file</link><pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2026 12:32:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:f7ca6fbc-55a2-4aa3-b86c-8dc7051e5b1b</guid><dc:creator>Sean Liao (Yu-Sheng)</dc:creator><description>Part Number: LMK1C1106 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: LMKDB1104 , LMKDB1102 , Hi all, Pls provide LMK1C1106 / LMKDB1104 / LMKDB1102 OLB file to build symbol, thanks a lot!</description><category domain="https://e2e.ti.com/support/clock-timing-group/clock-and-timing/tags/Wired%2bnetworking">Wired networking</category><category domain="https://e2e.ti.com/support/clock-timing-group/clock-and-timing/tags/LMKDB1104">LMKDB1104</category><category domain="https://e2e.ti.com/support/clock-timing-group/clock-and-timing/tags/LMKDB1102">LMKDB1102</category><category domain="https://e2e.ti.com/support/clock-timing-group/clock-and-timing/tags/LMK1C1106">LMK1C1106</category></item><item><title>Forum Post: LMX2595: Current Consumption</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/clock-timing-group/clock-and-timing/f/clock-timing-forum/1692260/lmx2595-current-consumption</link><pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2026 11:58:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:675d9cd1-5970-4b0c-a69e-417eaa5ca8e5</guid><dc:creator>Gone Akhil</dc:creator><description>Part Number: LMX2595 We are using the LMX2595 PLL synthesizer configured to generate a 16 GHz output frequency. After programming the device and achieving frequency lock, the measured current consumption is approximately 458 mA at a 3.3 V supply , which is higher than expected based on the datasheet specifications. Could you please help us identify the possible causes of this excessive current consumption and suggest ways to reduce it? Specifically, we would appreciate your guidance on the following points: What are the possible reasons for the LMX2595 drawing approximately 458 mA at a 16 GHz output frequency? Which register settings affect the device&amp;#39;s current consumption? Are there any recommended register configurations or settings that could help reduce current consumption without compromising frequency lock, output power, or phase-noise performance?</description><category domain="https://e2e.ti.com/support/clock-timing-group/clock-and-timing/tags/LMX2595">LMX2595</category><category domain="https://e2e.ti.com/support/clock-timing-group/clock-and-timing/tags/TICSPRO_2D00_SW">TICSPRO-SW</category><category domain="https://e2e.ti.com/support/clock-timing-group/clock-and-timing/tags/Aerospace%2b_2600_amp_3B00_%2bDefense">Aerospace &amp;amp; Defense</category></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: LMK05318B: Unexpected 1PPS Phase Offset Between PRIREF and OUT7</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/clock-timing-group/clock-and-timing/f/clock-timing-forum/1677428/lmk05318b-unexpected-1pps-phase-offset-between-priref-and-out7/6519672</link><pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2026 11:36:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:74aebae1-41c1-4d2b-b76f-88066762cef1</guid><dc:creator>Serizawa Toshitaka</dc:creator><description>Hellow, We have conducted several investigations regarding this issue. When we tested using another test board within our company, it appeared that the phase offset in the 1PPS signal is related to the shift in the OUT7 1PPS output timing following a SOFT_RESET. Could you advise on the possible factors that may contribute to this phenomenon? For your reference, please see the attached waveforms below. (1,2: Test Board, 3: LMK05318BEVM) Phase offset: about -70 ms Phase offset: about 500 ms Phase offset: about 0 s (EVM) Furthermore, with the test board showing about a 500 ms offset, we changed the frequency of the XO (19.2 MHz) from around -300 ppb to 2000 ppb and conducted SOFT RESET, but observed no change in the phase offset.</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: LMK1C1102A: LMK1C1102ADQFR : Output Enable of this IC</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/clock-timing-group/clock-and-timing/f/clock-timing-forum/1692118/lmk1c1102a-lmk1c1102adqfr-output-enable-of-this-ic</link><pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2026 05:48:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:6478cc51-2739-4e14-ac37-7129e46edbfb</guid><dc:creator>Ashwini Kumari M</dc:creator><description>Part Number: LMK1C1102A We would like to understand the output-enable behavior of the LMK1C1102ADQFR when a transition occurs at the CLKIN pin (pink waveform), with the 1G pin held permanently HIGH. Specifically, how do the outputs respond to this input transition?</description><category domain="https://e2e.ti.com/support/clock-timing-group/clock-and-timing/tags/LMK1C1102A">LMK1C1102A</category><category domain="https://e2e.ti.com/support/clock-timing-group/clock-and-timing/tags/Test%2b_2600_amp_3B00_%2bMeasurement">Test &amp;amp; Measurement</category></item><item><title>Forum Post: LMK05318B: Request for Certificate of Volatility for LMK05318BRGZ</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/clock-timing-group/clock-and-timing/f/clock-timing-forum/1692081/lmk05318b-request-for-certificate-of-volatility-for-lmk05318brgz</link><pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2026 02:56:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:98984a6e-1096-42c8-92c2-26b901403b58</guid><dc:creator>Wang Li</dc:creator><description>Part Number: LMK05318B To whom it may concern: We request a Certificate of Volatility for the unit/product supplied by Texas Instruments as detailed below, as part of one of my program’s sanitization procedures: Product/Model: CLOCK GENERATOR, LOW JITTER, 8 OUTPUT Unit ID/Serial: LMK05318BRGZ Please issue a certificate that: Describes the unit’s volatile/non-volatile memory characteristics and data retention behavior Identifies the unit by model and serial number States the certificate’s validity through Is signed by an authorized representative and provided on company letterhead (PDF). If available, please include supporting test reports or technical datasheets. Kindly confirm receipt and advise the expected issuance date. thanks.</description><category domain="https://e2e.ti.com/support/clock-timing-group/clock-and-timing/tags/LMK05318B">LMK05318B</category></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: CDCUN1208LP: Clock buffer timing appears to be not met by my design. Adding capacitors didn't help. Other Ideas?</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/clock-timing-group/clock-and-timing/f/clock-timing-forum/1691941/cdcun1208lp-clock-buffer-timing-appears-to-be-not-met-by-my-design-adding-capacitors-didn-t-help-other-ideas/6519142</link><pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2026 00:50:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:b759ac78-b62c-4c93-94b0-23b0bb263d6e</guid><dc:creator>Tristan Morris</dc:creator><description>Hey Clark, The current on VDD should be around 18mA, with the current on VDDO1234 around 36mA. Could you tell me a bit more about your application? It sounds like you want the clock to wait to start until after the 0.8V rail comes up, but I don&amp;#39;t see that rail in the schematic snippet you&amp;#39;ve shared. Since it&amp;#39;s not connected to the part, I would assume you are waiting on the part&amp;#39;s delay for it to start oscillating an output. I think reducing the VDD to a 1uF filter would be a good debug step to see if then VDD comes up before or at the same time as the VDDO pins. Thank you, Tristan</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: LMX2594: LMX2594 ramp limit low and high</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/clock-timing-group/clock-and-timing/f/clock-timing-forum/1691983/lmx2594-lmx2594-ramp-limit-low-and-high/6519131</link><pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2026 00:28:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:f9f9fc94-00b5-4774-a58d-d32292bf3c88</guid><dc:creator>Brian Mace</dc:creator><description>Hello Jim, Let me check with our design team for this part, and will get back to you later this week. Best, Brian</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: LMK04832: LMK04832 Debugging Issue</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/clock-timing-group/clock-and-timing/f/clock-timing-forum/1691918/lmk04832-lmk04832-debugging-issue/6519129</link><pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2026 00:25:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:030e9571-f015-48df-b1ca-ac64b21cb19a</guid><dc:creator>Brian Mace</dc:creator><description>Hello Ian, For this, we will need to set up a test bench to try to replicate this issue. We will get back to you later this week with an update. Best, Brian</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: LMK05028EVM: LMK05028EVM config as a 100 MHz to 10/100 MHz fanout</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/clock-timing-group/clock-and-timing/f/clock-timing-forum/1691608/lmk05028evm-lmk05028evm-config-as-a-100-mhz-to-10-100-mhz-fanout/6519047</link><pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2026 21:53:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:19b832bd-a417-464b-96bf-a2b346b91781</guid><dc:creator>Jaryd Dukes</dc:creator><description>Hi Kevin, Here is a .tcs file with the frequency plan you&amp;#39;re looking for; let me know if you have any issues with the config. lmk05028EVM-config.tcs Best, Jaryd</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: CDCUN1208LP: Clock buffer timing appears to be not met by my design. Adding capacitors didn't help. Other Ideas?</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/clock-timing-group/clock-and-timing/f/clock-timing-forum/1691941/cdcun1208lp-clock-buffer-timing-appears-to-be-not-met-by-my-design-adding-capacitors-didn-t-help-other-ideas/6518937</link><pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2026 19:31:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:6e311fe3-82df-4a90-a361-3396279e72c5</guid><dc:creator>Clark Tollerson</dc:creator><description /></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: CDCUN1208LP: Clock buffer timing appears to be not met by my design. Adding capacitors didn't help. Other Ideas?</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/clock-timing-group/clock-and-timing/f/clock-timing-forum/1691941/cdcun1208lp-clock-buffer-timing-appears-to-be-not-met-by-my-design-adding-capacitors-didn-t-help-other-ideas/6518933</link><pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2026 19:24:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:4f125d75-2c38-4caf-8a11-eb1cd434ede7</guid><dc:creator>Clark Tollerson</dc:creator><description>The TI CDCUN1208 Clock buffer provides the reference clock to a Broadcom Phy. Broadcom requires that the ref clock on power up not be present until the last supply is up. In my design 2.5V and 1.8V come up first, then 0.8V. On the 2.5V is the rail to both VDD and VDD1234 and I saw a requirement that VDD had to come up either before or at the same time as VDDO1,2,3,4. I thought I made an oscope capture where VDD01,2,3,4 came up before Vdd. Now when I capture it today I see ch 1 and ch 2 appear correct for VDD and VDD1234. VD1234 appears to be delayed some. I have a ferrite bead and 10uf cap and other smaller caps on Vdd but on the VDDO1234 I have only a 1uf and the same smaller caps and ferrite bead. It seems for the same current the VDDO1234 would come up first and I would not meet TI&amp;#39;s requirement. Can you tell me the current on VDD and VDD1234 (for 4 LVDS outputs)? Is a 10uf good on VDD and a 1uf on VDDO1234? Could I reduce VDD to a 1uF?</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: LMK05028EVM: LMK05028EVM config as a 100 MHz to 10/100 MHz fanout</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/clock-timing-group/clock-and-timing/f/clock-timing-forum/1691608/lmk05028evm-lmk05028evm-config-as-a-100-mhz-to-10-100-mhz-fanout/6518861</link><pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2026 18:02:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:0a8cae9d-e788-40c4-bdb2-7d386033ec74</guid><dc:creator>Kevin Battles</dc:creator><description>Hi Jaryd, would you be able to provide a .tcs config file for the LMK05028EVM that I could load to get the configuration I am looking for above without the 1 PPS TTL integration?</description></item></channel></rss>