<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://e2e.ti.com/cfs-file/__key/system/syndication/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Clock &amp; timing</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/clock-timing-group/clock-and-timing/</link><description> Products covered in this section are Clock Generation &amp;amp; Distribution, Memory Interface, Registers, Real Time Clocks and Timers. </description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Community 13</generator><item><title>Forum Post: RE: LMX1204: Regarding the BOM of the LMX1204EVM.</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/clock-timing-group/clock-and-timing/f/clock-timing-forum/1642068/lmx1204-regarding-the-bom-of-the-lmx1204evm/6335498</link><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 23:17:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:7cb15d58-0c9d-4378-8c26-e723848e636f</guid><dc:creator>Shuji Ishiwata</dc:creator><description>Hi Thank you for your answer. Please tell me your recommend ferrite beads. Best Regards, Ishiwata</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: LMKDB1202: Cascade Questions</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/clock-timing-group/clock-and-timing/f/clock-timing-forum/1643161/lmkdb1202-cascade-questions</link><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 17:26:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:c77a6745-1e1b-41fa-a987-961531c1511b</guid><dc:creator>Allan Fan</dc:creator><description>Part Number: LMKDB1202 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: LMKDB1204 Hi experts, Regarding the PCIe Gen6 RefClk: will it still function properly if it passes through 3 or 4 CLK buffers? Customer is considering LMKDB1204 and LMKDB1202. How should we estimate or evaluate the cumulative impact of cascading these buffers? Note that the specifications for the first buffer are currently unknown, as it depends on the specific motherboard design. BR, Allan</description><category domain="https://e2e.ti.com/support/clock-timing-group/clock-and-timing/tags/LMKDB1204">LMKDB1204</category><category domain="https://e2e.ti.com/support/clock-timing-group/clock-and-timing/tags/Data%2bcenter%2b_2600_amp_3B00_%2benterprise%2bcomputing">Data center &amp;amp; enterprise computing</category><category domain="https://e2e.ti.com/support/clock-timing-group/clock-and-timing/tags/LMKDB1202">LMKDB1202</category></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: LMK05318BEVM: spikes observed in the phase noise of 100 MHz output from LMK05318B eval board</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/clock-timing-group/clock-and-timing/f/clock-timing-forum/1642907/lmk05318bevm-spikes-observed-in-the-phase-noise-of-100-mhz-output-from-lmk05318b-eval-board/6335107</link><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 16:57:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:cda91a2b-ccd8-45fa-9d51-094e6a60424d</guid><dc:creator>Connor Lewis</dc:creator><description>Hi Suchitra, Thanks for the detailed summary here. Just to confirm, is the DPLL locked in the auto non-revertive phase noise plot? It&amp;#39;s possible that the spurs are being introduced by the 48MHz XO reference, and when the DPLL locks the close-in noise is dominated by the 10MHz reference so these spurs effectively get filtered out when the DPLL is locked. To verify this, could you capture phase noise measurements of the 48MHz reference? Could you also please attach your .tcs configuration files? The .txt programming files are helpful but the .tcs files help me review fields in the wizard configuration (such as DPLL LBW) which aren&amp;#39;t stored as simple register values.</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: LMK6B: Samples of LMK6BPE625000FDLR</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/clock-timing-group/clock-and-timing/f/clock-timing-forum/1643157/lmk6b-samples-of-lmk6bpe625000fdlr</link><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 16:43:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:42bad2eb-f0d3-40a4-a1be-e14cc74f170f</guid><dc:creator>Chih Wong</dc:creator><description>Part Number: LMK6B Dear, We can&amp;#39;t find LMK6BPE625000FDLR online, could you contact us and arrange samples? Regards, Chih</description><category domain="https://e2e.ti.com/support/clock-timing-group/clock-and-timing/tags/Broadband%2bfixed%2bline%2baccess">Broadband fixed line access</category><category domain="https://e2e.ti.com/support/clock-timing-group/clock-and-timing/tags/LMK6B">LMK6B</category></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: LMK04616: Software to configure LMK</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/clock-timing-group/clock-and-timing/f/clock-timing-forum/1642883/lmk04616-software-to-configure-lmk/6335053</link><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 16:31:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:6155e05d-dff6-4d41-90fb-64188256c1e9</guid><dc:creator>Noel Fung</dc:creator><description>Hi There, Did the link take you to below webpage? https://www.ti.com/tool/TICSPRO-SW</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: LMX2595EVM: Manual Ramping Pulse Count</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/clock-timing-group/clock-and-timing/f/clock-timing-forum/1643015/lmx2595evm-manual-ramping-pulse-count/6335035</link><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 16:23:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:2a815ae3-d911-4803-bf70-cded8c26e140</guid><dc:creator>Noel Fung</dc:creator><description>Hi There, If the 1MHz step size is at VCO frequency and the ramp clock frequency is low (e.g. 10kHz), then 3520 ramp clocks are enough. Please note, there are multiple VCO calculations during the whole ramp period. Calibration may take more than 20&amp;#181;s, during this time interval, ramp clock is ignored. For example, if your ramp clock frequency is 1MHz, assume the calibration takes 10&amp;#181;s, 10 ramp clocks will be ignored during calibration. As a result, you need more ramp clocks than the theoretical number.</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: LMK61E07: Request for IBIS model for LMK61E07-SIAT</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/clock-timing-group/clock-and-timing/f/clock-timing-forum/1643052/lmk61e07-request-for-ibis-model-for-lmk61e07-siat/6334979</link><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 15:50:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:de4585e9-fea3-47fc-b250-7dd4735e5816</guid><dc:creator>Connor Lewis</dc:creator><description>Hello, You can use the LMK61E2 IBIS model, found under the &amp;quot;Design tools &amp;amp; simulation&amp;quot; tab of the product page here: https://www.ti.com/product/LMK61E2#design-tools-simulation LMK61E2 and LMK62E07 have identical output drivers, so it should be suitable to use the LMK61E2 model for SI analysis. The main difference between these devices is that LMK61E07 uses a crystal with better frequency stability.</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: LMK61E07: Request for IBIS model for LMK61E07-SIAT</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/clock-timing-group/clock-and-timing/f/clock-timing-forum/1643052/lmk61e07-request-for-ibis-model-for-lmk61e07-siat</link><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 12:24:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:16ee364f-5e42-48c1-bccd-20e0ddfa40cd</guid><dc:creator>krish krish</dc:creator><description>Part Number: LMK61E07 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: LMK61E2 , Dear TI, I need IBIS model for LMK61E07-SIAT to carryout SI analysis for custom board application. Request you to kindly provide the same.</description><category domain="https://e2e.ti.com/support/clock-timing-group/clock-and-timing/tags/LMK61E2">LMK61E2</category><category domain="https://e2e.ti.com/support/clock-timing-group/clock-and-timing/tags/LMK61E07">LMK61E07</category></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: LMX2572: LMX2572: Allowable voltage drop during inrush</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/clock-timing-group/clock-and-timing/f/clock-timing-forum/1638689/lmx2572-lmx2572-allowable-voltage-drop-during-inrush/6334517</link><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 10:54:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:72d65858-29f9-4ff9-aa62-3bc6b0725bc3</guid><dc:creator>Andrew Williams</dc:creator><description>Hi Noel, I am just following up with regards to my previous question. Have you been able to have a look at it or can you provide a rough date at which you may be able to get back to me? This would help clarify our project timeline on resolving this issue.</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: LMX2595EVM: Manual Ramping Pulse Count</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/clock-timing-group/clock-and-timing/f/clock-timing-forum/1643015/lmx2595evm-manual-ramping-pulse-count</link><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 10:44:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:81b03822-f366-4867-9453-24d2d4b55058</guid><dc:creator>Akshay  Sugandhi</dc:creator><description>Part Number: LMX2595EVM I am performing manual ramping, from 480 MHz to 700 MHz and its equivalent fvco is 7860 MHz and 11200 MHz respectively. and trying to ramp with step size of 1 MHz. Below are the calculations made as per TICs pro software channel divider 16 Ramp Input Clock 0 2684355 Ramp Input Clock 1 1071057469 Ramp Limit high 590558003.2 Ramp Limit Low 8589934591. My doubt is that how do I calculate the number of ramp clock pulses needed here ? If I use ramp pulse count = (fvc stop frequnecy - fvco start frequency)/step size I observed that its just ramping from 485MHz to 521MHz, even though we are sending 3520 pulse pulse count = (11200-7680)/1 = 3520 pulses Could you please explain why is this happening ? but if I send double (3520*2) pulses I get full range (480 to 700MHz).</description><category domain="https://e2e.ti.com/support/clock-timing-group/clock-and-timing/tags/LMX2595EVM">LMX2595EVM</category></item><item><title>Forum Post: LMK05318BEVM: spikes observed in the phase noise of 100 MHz output from LMK05318B eval board</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/clock-timing-group/clock-and-timing/f/clock-timing-forum/1642907/lmk05318bevm-spikes-observed-in-the-phase-noise-of-100-mhz-output-from-lmk05318b-eval-board</link><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 07:52:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:f235cdc7-b4fd-4ea0-8f90-f0f6048afc1b</guid><dc:creator>Suchitra  Ramamoorthy</dc:creator><description>Part Number: LMK05318BEVM Other Parts Discussed in Thread: LMK05318B Hello, We are using the LMK05318B eval board to generate 100 MHz from OUT0_P and OUT7_P of LMK05318B. The eval board is operated on a +5V supply, which is connected to Vin1. 10 MHz OCXO(+2dBm) is given at PRIREF_P and 48 MHZ OCXO (0dBm) is given at XO_P connectors on the eval board respectively. The OUT0_P and OUT7_P are enabled to give 100 MHz. When the reference input switching mode is set as Auto Non-Revertive, we get a 100MHz output with a clean phase noise with no spikes in the phase noise plot. The image is attached below. Whereas, when we set the switching mode to manual holdover, we observe spikes in the phase noise of 100 MHz. The image is also attached below. The eval board is being programmed using TICSPro GUI. The programming files of both cases are attached below. 100 MHz auto non revertive.txt 100 MHz manual holdover.txt We want to get a clean phase noise in the manual holdover mode as well. Any insights into this issue would be greatly helpful. Regards, Suchitra Ramamoorthy.</description><category domain="https://e2e.ti.com/support/clock-timing-group/clock-and-timing/tags/LMK05318BEVM">LMK05318BEVM</category><category domain="https://e2e.ti.com/support/clock-timing-group/clock-and-timing/tags/LMK05318B">LMK05318B</category></item><item><title>Forum Post: LMK04616: Software to configure LMK</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/clock-timing-group/clock-and-timing/f/clock-timing-forum/1642883/lmk04616-software-to-configure-lmk</link><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 07:02:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:60f526c1-5426-4cde-9efa-3da46d1000a4</guid><dc:creator>Mike Meury</dc:creator><description>Part Number: LMK04616 Hi, I want to use a GUI interface to configure a LMK04616ZCR present on homemade board through an SPI interface. I am just requesting a usable link to download TICSPRO SW correctly because the link on the website lead me to a bad request page. Thanks for your help.</description><category domain="https://e2e.ti.com/support/clock-timing-group/clock-and-timing/tags/LMK04616">LMK04616</category><category domain="https://e2e.ti.com/support/clock-timing-group/clock-and-timing/tags/TICSPRO_2D00_SW">TICSPRO-SW</category></item><item><title>Forum Post: CDCBT1001: CDCBT1001 Application for 50ohm termination load</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/clock-timing-group/clock-and-timing/f/clock-timing-forum/1642858/cdcbt1001-cdcbt1001-application-for-50ohm-termination-load</link><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 06:02:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:f07f77b9-bbd1-4e2d-bf4b-4a26007f4f33</guid><dc:creator>Youwei Lin</dc:creator><description>Part Number: CDCBT1001 Hi TI team, We are using CDCBT1001 with VDD_OUT = 2.5V to drive a single-ended 10MHz clock at 50ohm load as picture below. Vout is (2.5)(34)/(34+50)=1.5V due to voltage divider and Iout is 2.5V/(34+50)=30mA which is below maximum continuous output current 50mA, but since datasheet does not list out the recommended operating condition for VDD_OUT=2.5V, we would like to know if this 30mA would cause damage to the device and shorten the device lifetime or it is acceptable for the device under this kind of operating conditon? BTW, Is there other recommended buffer IC that is able to drive a 50ohm load under recommended operating condition...? Thanks, YW</description><category domain="https://e2e.ti.com/support/clock-timing-group/clock-and-timing/tags/CDCBT1001">CDCBT1001</category><category domain="https://e2e.ti.com/support/clock-timing-group/clock-and-timing/tags/Data%2bcenter%2b_2600_amp_3B00_%2benterprise%2bcomputing">Data center &amp;amp; enterprise computing</category></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: LMX2594: SYNC function</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/clock-timing-group/clock-and-timing/f/clock-timing-forum/1642346/lmx2594-sync-function/6334075</link><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 05:38:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:5e468d2b-a820-4fd4-ad4d-981beb3d966f</guid><dc:creator>yaacov shoef</dc:creator><description>thanks Noel, my reason for doing the timing is because I need also cat.3 cases. my question is : if multiple pulses (let say 5 pulses) in spaces of 10ns (the clock period) can damage the sync process? and another question: is the ambiguity of sometimes 0 degrees and sometimes 180 degrees an expected result or the sync function should yield always 0 degrees?</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: LMK04828: Multi-Board MTS Synchronization Scheme for Zynq UltraScale+ RFSoC 49DR Gen 3 and LMK04828</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/clock-timing-group/clock-and-timing/f/clock-timing-forum/1638587/lmk04828-multi-board-mts-synchronization-scheme-for-zynq-ultrascale-rfsoc-49dr-gen-3-and-lmk04828/6334057</link><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 05:20:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:fe088114-3a4f-4280-832d-bbd9466bf9fe</guid><dc:creator>Pratiksha Halijwale1</dc:creator><description>Hi Michael, Oscin frequency is 100 MHz. I am generating 225MHz as ref and 5.625MHz as sysref frequency. Can I configure it in zero delay mode with sysref as feedback frequency without changing input reference frequency of 100MHz? Also, if I don&amp;#39;t use zero delay mode then applying a sync pulse to sync pin of lmk will align the clocks on multiple boards? Thanks, Pratiksha</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: TMS320F28335-Q1: TMS320F28335-Q1 IC interface with Crystal via series damping resistor to reduce to within Drive level of Crystal</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/clock-timing-group/clock-and-timing/f/clock-timing-forum/1642622/tms320f28335-q1-tms320f28335-q1-ic-interface-with-crystal-via-series-damping-resistor-to-reduce-to-within-drive-level-of-crystal/6333974</link><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 04:06:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:ced8836f-c3aa-4325-b586-d607cc17eb05</guid><dc:creator>MatthewPate</dc:creator><description>To your initial questions; the Rd needs to be placed on the X2 net, as this is what is driving the XTAL, so Rd here will reduce the current that the XTAL sees. I don&amp;#39;t believe that placement on the X1 net will have any effect on the damping. X1 itself is a high impedance node. Based on other E2E posts I believe that the oscillator circuit will have a maximum of 100uW drive level. If your crystal can handle this amount we can bypass the Rd altogether and remove it from X1 circuit. Else we do need a Rd, and it should be moved over to X2 per the above. No, the internal oscillator doesn&amp;#39;t have a damping resistor built in. There is a Rf internally, so that doesn&amp;#39;t need to be added to the design. If needed I&amp;#39;d start with a Rd on the smaller side to not limit the drive current as much, so that the XTAL starts up quickly. Again if the XTAL can take up to 100uW, then there&amp;#39;s no need for a Rd at all. Best Matthew</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: LMX2594: LMX2594: No-Assist VCO Calibration Fails to Lock at -30°C — Some Chips Lock While Others Don't on the Same Board</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/clock-timing-group/clock-and-timing/f/clock-timing-forum/1641366/lmx2594-lmx2594-no-assist-vco-calibration-fails-to-lock-at--30-c-some-chips-lock-while-others-don-t-on-the-same-board/6333843</link><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 01:29:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:9d854a62-4b07-473a-8958-8514c543e981</guid><dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator><description>Hi, Sorry for taking so long to reply. The TCXO output signal is sinewave of 7dBm with 50-ohm loaded and its output harmonics level is &amp;lt;-35dBc. Its connections is shown in the figure.</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: LMK3H0102: Question about "LP-HCSL CLOCK OUTPUT CHARACTERISTICS" table of LMK3H0102</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/clock-timing-group/clock-and-timing/f/clock-timing-forum/1642488/lmk3h0102-question-about-lp-hcsl-clock-output-characteristics-table-of-lmk3h0102/6333818</link><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 00:21:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:01ff4e35-29b3-4c27-afb7-508d094910f4</guid><dc:creator>Jaryd Dukes</dc:creator><description>Hi Tim, The VOH for LP-HCSL is defined by a single-ended output with respect to ground. V_A in the image represents the single-ended VOH seen in the datasheet, while V_B is the output low voltage (V_min) Best, Jaryd</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: LMK04828: Design review</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/clock-timing-group/clock-and-timing/f/clock-timing-forum/1641735/lmk04828-design-review/6333802</link><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 23:47:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:423f910e-e81c-4643-9677-65f88a2aaa7f</guid><dc:creator>Michael Srinivasan</dc:creator><description>HI JH, The configurations look good! Just make sure that CLKin1 is configured to send the input to the FB Mux. Thanks, Michael</description></item><item><title>Forum Post: RE: LMK04832EVM: LMP7731MF/NOPB(U6) on LMK04832 EVM</title><link>https://e2e.ti.com/support/clock-timing-group/clock-and-timing/f/clock-timing-forum/1641837/lmk04832evm-lmp7731mf-nopb-u6-on-lmk04832-evm/6333745</link><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 22:15:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">cb01d8b2-d089-468d-babb-77d1d8683490:f93b5853-05e1-4a7f-a52e-3233b4cb874b</guid><dc:creator>BH KIM</dc:creator><description>There is no problem with on-board Crystek VCXO. We are testing with Q-tech VCXO via external SMA. As I have posted my previous problem that LMK04832 did not create the PLL1 lock with Q-tech 122.88MHz VCXO and 10Mhz Reference clock. ( https://e2e.ti.com/support/clock-timing-group/clock-and-timing/f/clock-timing-forum/1613987/lmk04832-lmk04832-lock-issue-due-to-vcxo-s-harmonics/6224926?tisearch=e2e-sitesearch&amp;amp;keymatch=%2520user%253A416399# ) (PLL1 lock has well operated with Crystek VCXO) So, we are looking for a way to lock PLL1 when using the Q-tech VCXO(Q-tech VCXO&amp;#39;s input impedance is 51kohm). Are you saying the amp on the EVM can&amp;#39;t be used as an impedance buffer? If I want to use it as one, do I need to modify the board?</description></item></channel></rss>