Tool/software:
Hi TI experts,
This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
Tool/software:
Hi TI experts,
Hi,
I will get back on this shortly .
Hi Sachin,
After browsing more information, I have thought more about this issue, before I said that the statement that the two AFE58JD48 are considered as a 32-ch/8-lane JESD transmitter should be wrong, these two AFE58JD48 (80x mode) should be received as four 8-ch/2-lane JESD transmitters.
I still think I can use a Xilinx JESD204C IP core to handle these four JESD links, and only need to configure L/M/F=2/8/8 (80X) as per the AFE58JD48 documentation, since the JESD IP core maintains the rx ila data for each lane individually, is this right?
Also, I have a question about your official AFE58JD48 JESD reference design, why only two lanes of the JESD rx core are activated in the code, when it is clear that in 40X mode (F=4) all lanes should be activated.
Code location: JESD_TOP.v line34 parameter active_lanes = 72
Yes , By properly setting LMF parameter in FPGA you can handle this . This device supports JESD204B not JESD204C .
In this example it looks like there are receiving data in only 2 lanes .(lane _mode parameter) . So it might not the example for 40X mode .
I had to use the Xilinx JESD204C IP core to be backward compatible with the JESD204B because the JESD204B IP core was deprecated in the vivado version after v2022.1 (and probably a bit earlier).
I think the reference project is the 40x mode because of the use of 8 lanes of one AFE and the setting of F=4