This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

ADS131E0x need clarification for the noise measurement tables

Other Parts Discussed in Thread: ADS131E04, ADS131E08

Hi

In the datasheet for the ADS131E04/06/08  there is the table 1 and table 2  where Input noise figures are placed.

But in this tables besides CONGIG1 and Output Data rate is menstioned -3dB bandwidth. Could someone explain what does this  bandwidth mean?

  • The ADS131E08 is a delta-sigma ADC and  implements a 3rd order low-pass sinc filter as the digital filter used to decimate the modulator output data.

    The -3dB point is the frequency at which the sinc filter of the ADC reaches -3dBFS.  See Sinc Filter Stage section and FIgures 42-45 in the datasheet for more information.

  • Hi Greg,

    I understand that for delta-sigma ADC we have internal low pass filter by default. For ADS131E family we have third order low pas filter. Unfortunately it is not clear for me  how could I impact on the Sinc Filterbandwidth .

    Am I correct that bandwidth  of the Sinc Filter is defined only by output rate and we doesn't have any possibility to impact on it?

    I mean next. With DR  BITS 010 I have output data rate 16kSPS with 24-bit resolution. This mean that Sinc filter according to the table 1 or table 2 will be 4192Hz. So this mean that I couldn't measure input signal with frequency 5kHz. This mean that I could only decrease decimation ratio and go to the 16-bit 32kSPS to measure 5kHz signal. Am I right?

  • For the ADS131E0x, you are correct in that you cannot change the behavior of the internal sinc filter.  This is pretty standard behavior for most delta-sigma converters since these filters effect the operation and performance of the device.

    You can still put in signals above the -3dB cutoff frequency (keep below FS/2), however they will be attenuated by the sinc filter as shown in the graphs.  You would potentially want to compensate for the attenuation/droop in the signal magnitude through external/post-processing means.